Replies: 2 comments
-
@Krastanov, please let me know that whether these outputs showing expected behaviour (2nd shaded block) of |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Hm, I think it's possible this might not make sense. It's an experimental work from a while back when I was trying some stuff. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi, Stefan!
I would like to ask you a question about
conjugate destabs.
Please let me know if this is plausible: so we haveapply!
forCliffordOperator
, but it's only conjugating the.stab
parts and nothing is happening to thedestabs
. You have commented # TODO conjugate also the destabs . In light of this, I think a function should be callled insideapply!
after this line(apply!(state.stab, gate))
, so that we can conjugate destabs.Currently, without conjugate destabs, we have the following output:
Please let me know that after implementing
conjugate destabs,
are these plausible? I hope this is not so bad.Thank you for your time.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions