@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ jupytext:
44 extension : .md
55 format_name : myst
66 format_version : 0.13
7- jupytext_version : 1.17.2
7+ jupytext_version : 1.17.3
88kernelspec :
99 display_name : Python 3 (ipykernel)
1010 language : python
@@ -266,7 +266,6 @@ class Model(NamedTuple):
266266 q: jnp.ndarray = q_default # probabilities over wage offers
267267```
268268
269-
270269### Operators
271270
272271We'll use a similar iterative approach to solving the Bellman equations that we
@@ -299,7 +298,6 @@ def T_e(model, v_u, v_e):
299298 return v_e_new
300299```
301300
302-
303301### Iteration
304302
305303Now we write an iteration routine, which updates the pair of arrays $v_u$, $v_e$ until convergence.
@@ -335,8 +333,6 @@ def solve_full_model(
335333 return v_u, v_e
336334```
337335
338-
339-
340336### Computing the Reservation Wage
341337
342338Now that we can solve for both value functions, let's investigate the reservation wage.
@@ -597,81 +593,38 @@ Next we will investigate how the reservation wage varies with parameters.
597593
598594## Impact of Parameters
599595
600- In each instance below, we'll show you a figure and then ask you to reproduce it in the exercises.
596+ In each instance below, we'll investigate how the reservation wage $\bar w$ varies
597+ with a particular parameter of interest, holding the other parameters fixed at their default values.
601598
602599### The Reservation Wage and Unemployment Compensation
603600
604601First, let's look at how $\bar w$ varies with unemployment compensation.
605602
606- In the figure below, we use the default parameters in the ` Model ` class, apart from
607- c (which takes the values given on the horizontal axis)
608-
609- ``` {glue:figure} mccall_resw_c
610- :figwidth: 600px
611-
612- ```
613-
614- As expected, higher unemployment compensation causes the worker to hold out for higher wages.
615-
616- In effect, the cost of continuing job search is reduced.
617-
618- ### The Reservation Wage and Discounting
619-
620- Next, let's investigate how $\bar w$ varies with the discount factor.
621-
622- The next figure plots the reservation wage associated with different values of
623- $\beta$
624-
625- ``` {glue:figure} mccall_resw_beta
626- :figwidth: 600px
627-
628- ```
629-
630- Again, the results are intuitive: More patient workers will hold out for higher wages.
631-
632- ### The Reservation Wage and Job Destruction
633-
634- Finally, let's look at how $\bar w$ varies with the job separation rate $\alpha$.
635-
636- Higher $\alpha$ translates to a greater chance that a worker will face termination in each period once employed.
637-
638- ``` {glue:figure} mccall_resw_alpha
639- :figwidth: 600px
640-
641- ```
642-
643- Once more, the results are in line with our intuition.
644-
645- If the separation rate is high, then the benefit of holding out for a higher wage falls.
646-
647- Hence the reservation wage is lower.
648-
649- ## Exercises
603+ In the exercise below, we use the default parameters in the ` Model ` class, apart from
604+ $c$ (which takes the values given on the horizontal axis).
650605
651606``` {exercise-start}
652607:label: mmws_ex1
653608```
654609
655- Reproduce all the reservation wage figures shown above .
610+ Generate a figure showing how $\bar w$ varies with unemployment compensation $c$ .
656611
657- Regarding the values on the horizontal axis, use
612+ Use the following values for unemployment compensation on the horizontal axis:
658613
659614``` {code-cell} ipython3
660615grid_size = 25
661616c_vals = jnp.linspace(2, 12, grid_size) # unemployment compensation
662- β_vals = jnp.linspace(0.8, 0.99, grid_size) # discount factors
663- α_vals = jnp.linspace(0.05, 0.5, grid_size) # separation rate
664617```
665618
619+ Interpret the results.
620+
666621``` {exercise-end}
667622```
668623
669624``` {solution-start} mmws_ex1
670625:class: dropdown
671626```
672627
673- Here's the first figure.
674-
675628``` {code-cell} ipython3
676629def compute_res_wage_given_c(c):
677630 model = Model(c=c)
@@ -688,7 +641,41 @@ glue("mccall_resw_c", fig, display=False)
688641plt.show()
689642```
690643
691- Here's the second one.
644+ As expected, higher unemployment compensation causes the worker to hold out for higher wages.
645+
646+ In effect, the cost of continuing job search is reduced.
647+
648+ ``` {solution-end}
649+ ```
650+
651+ ### The Reservation Wage and Discounting
652+
653+ Next, let's investigate how $\bar w$ varies with the discount factor.
654+
655+ The next exercise considers the reservation wage associated with different values of
656+ $\beta$.
657+
658+ ``` {exercise-start}
659+ :label: mmws_ex2
660+ ```
661+
662+ Generate a figure showing how $\bar w$ varies with the discount factor $\beta$.
663+
664+ Use the following values for the discount factor on the horizontal axis:
665+
666+ ``` {code-cell} ipython3
667+ grid_size = 25
668+ β_vals = jnp.linspace(0.8, 0.99, grid_size) # discount factors
669+ ```
670+
671+ Interpret the results.
672+
673+ ``` {exercise-end}
674+ ```
675+
676+ ``` {solution-start} mmws_ex2
677+ :class: dropdown
678+ ```
692679
693680``` {code-cell} ipython3
694681def compute_res_wage_given_beta(β):
@@ -706,7 +693,37 @@ glue("mccall_resw_beta", fig, display=False)
706693plt.show()
707694```
708695
709- Here's the third.
696+ Again, the results are intuitive: More patient workers will hold out for higher wages.
697+
698+
699+ ``` {solution-end}
700+ ```
701+
702+ ### The Reservation Wage and Job Destruction
703+
704+ Finally, let's look at how $\bar w$ varies with the job separation rate $\alpha$.
705+
706+ Higher $\alpha$ translates to a greater chance that a worker will face termination in each period once employed.
707+
708+ ``` {exercise-start}
709+ :label: mmws_ex3
710+ ```
711+
712+ Generate a figure showing how $\bar w$ varies with the separation rate $\alpha$.
713+
714+ Use the following values for the separation rate on the horizontal axis:
715+
716+ ``` {code-cell} ipython3
717+ grid_size = 25
718+ α_vals = jnp.linspace(0.05, 0.5, grid_size) # separation rate
719+ ```
720+
721+ ``` {exercise-end}
722+ ```
723+
724+ ``` {solution-start} mmws_ex3
725+ :class: dropdown
726+ ```
710727
711728``` {code-cell} ipython3
712729def compute_res_wage_given_alpha(α):
@@ -724,5 +741,13 @@ glue("mccall_resw_alpha", fig, display=False)
724741plt.show()
725742```
726743
744+
745+ Once more, the results are in line with our intuition.
746+
747+ If the separation rate is high, then the benefit of holding out for a higher wage falls.
748+
749+ Hence the reservation wage is lower.
750+
751+
727752``` {solution-end}
728753```
0 commit comments