FOUR-20583: Improve vendors

[henryjonathanquispe]

Solution

• PR Based in FOUR-20583

Related Tickets & Packages

• https://processmaker.atlassian.net/browse/FOUR-20583

Code Review Checklist

• I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
• This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
• This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
• This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
• This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
• This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
• This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
• This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
• This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

ci:deploy

[henryjonathanquispe]

We are working in the change and solve conflicts with bootstrap.js and app-layout.js , the async load with some packages.

[henryjonathanquispe]

This PR is the first part of the improve.
These changes are necessary to continue with
https://processmaker.atlassian.net/browse/FOUR-20584

[henryjonathanquispe]

Test with edit tasks, exists some problems with the async, we need the build to test these scenarios @pmPaulis

[processmaker-sonarqube]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube