Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[common] Refactor PCL_DEPRECATED macro #3945

Merged

Conversation

kunaltyagi
Copy link
Member

@kunaltyagi kunaltyagi commented Apr 18, 2020

Refactored for

New error stack shows only PCL_DEPRECATED and PCL_DEPRECATED_IMPL, with the relevant lines being quite understandable.

@kunaltyagi kunaltyagi added needs: feedback Specify why not closed/merged yet and removed needs: code review Specify why not closed/merged yet labels Apr 21, 2020
@kunaltyagi kunaltyagi added needs: code review Specify why not closed/merged yet and removed needs: feedback Specify why not closed/merged yet labels Apr 21, 2020
Copy link
Member

@taketwo taketwo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks reasonable!

common/include/pcl/pcl_macros.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-Authored-By: Sergey Alexandrov <alexandrov88@gmail.com>
@kunaltyagi
Copy link
Member Author

Note: remove pr_merge from #3931 post merge

@SergioRAgostinho SergioRAgostinho merged commit cb570cc into PointCloudLibrary:master Apr 23, 2020
@taketwo taketwo changed the title [common] Refactoring PCL_DEPRECATED macro [common] Refactor PCL_DEPRECATED macro May 10, 2020
truhoang pushed a commit to truhoang/pcl that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2020
Co-Authored-By: Sergey Alexandrov <alexandrov88@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog: enhancement Meta-information for changelog generation module: common needs: code review Specify why not closed/merged yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants