Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

autonumbering: Upcoming REDCap Feature Improvement #175

Open
thomasnwilson opened this issue Sep 8, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

autonumbering: Upcoming REDCap Feature Improvement #175

thomasnwilson opened this issue Sep 8, 2017 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@thomasnwilson
Copy link
Member

Just wanted to give you a heads up about an improved feature for REDCap that may or may not affect REDCapR. The autonumber capability already exists in REDCap, but they have expanded that capability to allow autonumbering when you import data. Essentially, REDCap reads the last record_id in REDCap and starts numbering your import file from the last record. This also works with the API import as well. This will happen in the next couple of weeks with version 7.6.4.

@wibeasley wibeasley self-assigned this Sep 8, 2017
@wibeasley wibeasley changed the title Upcoming REDCap Feature Improvement autonumbering: Upcoming REDCap Feature Improvement May 28, 2018
@RollieParrish
Copy link

Checking the status of supporting forceAutoNumber with importing records as described above. I'd be happy to submit a PR if that would help.

@wibeasley
Copy link
Member

wibeasley commented Sep 24, 2019

Hi @RollieParrish, I see you've changed usernames.

That would be great. And if you're unfamiliar with the testing part of it, will you describe some plain-English tests in the issue, and I'll translate them into testthat language.

Since we're not wiping the project clean every time (just deleting the records), I'm assuming the autonumber will be dynamically determined (and it's not always 1, 2, 3, ...)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants