Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Generate already lint code from procedural generation #5060

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 30, 2024
Merged

Generate already lint code from procedural generation #5060

merged 2 commits into from
May 30, 2024

Conversation

Amxx
Copy link
Collaborator

@Amxx Amxx commented May 30, 2024

This will improve the speed of the generation process.

@changeset-bot changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented May 30, 2024 •
edited
Loading

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: d43aa48

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@Amxx Amxx force-pushed the procedural/clean-templates branch from 8a84d2a to 45438f3 Compare May 30, 2024 14:22
@ernestognw ernestognw changed the title Procedural generation: generate properly formated code without relying to prettier Generate already lint code from procedural generation May 30, 2024
@ernestognw ernestognw merged commit dd1e898 into OpenZeppelin:master May 30, 2024
19 checks passed
@Amxx Amxx deleted the procedural/clean-templates branch May 30, 2024 15:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@ernestognw ernestognw ernestognw approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
ignore-changeset
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@Amxx @ernestognw