Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 24, 2021. It is now read-only.

Support user defined aliases instead of numeric IDs in ValueId gateway type #45

@soumya92

Description

@soumya92

I see the argument against using names for the value classes (localisation, subject to change, etc.). However, it would be great if nodes could still be named. Those arguments do not apply to node names as they are specified manually in the UI.

This would help tremendously with moving/replacing z-wave devices.

Currently the options are /33/112/1/90, requiring downstream consumers to keep track of Node IDs, or /door5/sensor_binary/sensor, where sensor_binary and sensor are not guaranteed to be stable since they come from an external library. If we had a hybrid option like /door5/112/1/90, then consumers do not need to know which node ID to use, but they can still use constant IDs for the value.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions