Compatibility with newer verison of procps

[havardAasen]

There has been some changes with the newer (> 4.0) version of procps(-ng) library. It seems they no longer include proc/devname.h, which is needed for the files src/OVAL/probes/unix/process58_probe.c and src/OVAL/probes/unix/process_probe.c.

Not sure what's best action moving forward, politely ask procps maintainer to include the header again, or just rely on compat/dev_to_tty.c.

[evgenyz]

Well, Fedora and RHEL are using compat/dev_to_tty.c without procps-ng-devel. So far I'm not aware of any problems related to that.

[evgenyz]

I mean, default package configuration is not to ask for that header. Which is the config most of our users are facing.

[havardAasen]

Hmmm, yes, the only reference I could find in the documentation was this.

openscap/docs/developer/developer.adoc

Line 156 in d10c40e

wget lua which procps-ng initscripts chkconfig sendmail bzip2 rpm-build strace

And that's not the development package.

Could the references in the code and CMake be removed? This will likely only lead to confusion, especially with the latest release of procps that' don't even have the necessary header. Then we are forced to use compat/dev_to_tty.c regardless.