You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
WhiteLibrary seems to support syntax like type=value with its locators similarly as SeleniumLibrary. The syntax is problematic, though, because it clashes with Robot's named only argument syntax as issue #48 demonstrates. The syntax was also considered problematic with SeleniumLibrary, and it has supported type:value syntax since SL 3.0. For more details see robotframework/SeleniumLibrary#908.
In my opinion it would be good for WhiteLibrary to support the type:value syntax as well. Because the library is still pretty young, I'd actually recommend deprecating the old syntax in the future to have only one syntax in the end.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
pekkaklarck
changed the title
New type:value locator syntax in addition (or instead) type=value syntax
New type:value locator syntax in addition to (or instead of) type=value syntax
Jan 8, 2019
WhiteLibrary seems to support syntax like
type=value
with its locators similarly as SeleniumLibrary. The syntax is problematic, though, because it clashes with Robot's named only argument syntax as issue #48 demonstrates. The syntax was also considered problematic with SeleniumLibrary, and it has supportedtype:value
syntax since SL 3.0. For more details see robotframework/SeleniumLibrary#908.In my opinion it would be good for WhiteLibrary to support the
type:value
syntax as well. Because the library is still pretty young, I'd actually recommend deprecating the old syntax in the future to have only one syntax in the end.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: