Rethink discrete_alloc operator arguments #273
jipclaassens
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 3 comments 8 replies
-
|
Hi @jipclaassens , where is the full allocation function, I want to see it. It is not on the public repo, why is that? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
8 replies
-
|
We have added simpler versions for discrete_alloc:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
All discrete_alloc versions are implemented in https://github.com/ObjectVision/GeoDMS/blob/v16/geo/dll/src/DiscrAlloc.cpp |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The discrete_alloc operator now needs a lot of arguments, which might not all be as relevant anymore?
Can we omit the feasible solution?
And the partitioning? (which actually requires an explicitly configured attribute called id in the AggRegio unit).
And the partitioning name
And more leniency with respect to the value types?
And the claims with value units which can be checked? Hectare for example?
Function-discrete-alloc
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions