Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

A lot of the restore coverage relies on project.json instead of PackageReference tests #10212

Open
nkolev92 opened this issue Oct 30, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

A lot of the restore coverage relies on project.json instead of PackageReference tests #10212

nkolev92 opened this issue Oct 30, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
Functionality:Restore Priority:2 Issues for the current backlog. Style:PackageReference Type:Test

Comments

@nkolev92
Copy link
Member

These 2 are largely equivalent in the core restore part, but there are some slight differences.
We should move these tests to PR.

Related: #10211
@nkolev92 nkolev92 added Functionality:Restore Style:PackageReference Type:Test Priority:2 Issues for the current backlog. Category:Quality Week Issues that should be considered for quality week and removed Category:Quality Week Issues that should be considered for quality week labels Oct 30, 2020
@nkolev92 nkolev92 mentioned this issue Oct 30, 2020
Merged
@nkolev92 nkolev92 added the TechDebt Technical debt label Dec 1, 2023
@nkolev92 nkolev92 removed the TechDebt Technical debt label Apr 10, 2024
@nkolev92 nkolev92 mentioned this issue Apr 10, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Functionality:Restore Priority:2 Issues for the current backlog. Style:PackageReference Type:Test
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@nkolev92 @heng-liu