Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Keep an eye on zlib-ng #32

Open
gdevenyi opened this issue Dec 17, 2018 · 7 comments
Open

Keep an eye on zlib-ng #32

gdevenyi opened this issue Dec 17, 2018 · 7 comments

Comments

@gdevenyi
Copy link
Contributor

Good things are happening in the zlib world:
https://github.com/zlib-ng/zlib-ng

@hjmjohnson
Copy link
Contributor

Also consider: https://github.com/facebook/zstd

@hjmjohnson
Copy link
Contributor

See conversations related to this topic at:

This is a upstream ITK question, of which there's already some discussion:
InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITK#348

Also, https://github.com/zlib-ng/zlib-ng is trying to drag the "official" zlib implementation forward in a non-breaking way.

ANTsX/ANTs#702 (comment)

@hjmjohnson
Copy link
Contributor

@gdevenyi It seems that this topic is gaining traction again. Do you have any recommendations?

@gdevenyi
Copy link
Contributor Author

gdevenyi commented Jul 1, 2021

I'm currently implementing zlib-ng in ITK and also looking at updating Niftilib in ITK. That may involve me working on this.

@dzenanz
Copy link
Contributor

dzenanz commented Sep 8, 2021

zlib-ng in ITK is ready for a spin. It also increases compression speed for .nii.gz files.

@gdevenyi
Copy link
Contributor Author

gdevenyi commented Sep 9, 2021

We shall continue to keep an eye on zlib-ng with the hopes of minimizing our divergence from the main codebase (when they merge the prefix code)

@dzenanz
Copy link
Contributor

dzenanz commented Dec 14, 2022

Prefix code is part of zlib-ng. Time to give this another look?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants