You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 25, 2018. It is now read-only.
Because we use the certainty and occurrence to filter out non trustworthy information or irrelevant information, how can we distinguish between these "fun facts"/non-Wikipedia relations from completely irrelevant information?
The idea here is to filter out those named entities that are found in our relationships database and can also be found on the Wikipedia info box. E.G. most likely we would find the relationship Beethoven born in Bonn, Germany. Wikipedia already has that relationship in the info box section. So the outcome of this issue will be to filter out this tired tidbit from the knowledge base we are creating.
Right, so you want to distinguish between "common knowledge", something that everyone knows, and less known facts?
I think this can simply be implemented by query results that have occurrence lower than a certain threshold. The obvious drawback here is I stated before, that low occurrence may also mean low trustworthiness.
Continuing this discussion (MusicConnectionMachine/RelationshipsG3#22) where it belongs: here :)
@Henni @martomi
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: