Get-Certificate examples fixes

[Styxxy]

• removed extra white space (lines) which makes the code sample unnecessarily long
• removed redundant parenthesis in variable assignment
• moved location of cli after Set-Location

[opbld32]

Docs Build status updates of commit 0057e1d:

🕙 Pending: waiting for processors (14 builds ahead of you)

⚠️ Docs Build is busy, currently there are 14 builds ahead of this one, for more information you can view the Build queue graph on the Docs Portal.

[opbld33]

Docs Build status updates of commit 0057e1d:

✅ Validation status: passed

File	Status	Preview URL	Details
docset/windows/pkiclient/Get-Certificate.md	✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

Note: If you changed an existing file name or deleted a file, broken links in other files to the deleted or renamed file are listed only in the full build report.

[skycommand]

Hi. If you wouldn't mind having a suggestion, I think the prompts on the page are entirely redundant. Why not get rid of all instances of "PS C:\>" and "PS cert:\LocalMachine\My>"? That'll make the page more readable.

Edit: Same goes for #1649, #1648, #1647, #1646, #1645, #1644, #1643, and #1641.

[Styxxy]

Hi. If you wouldn't mind having a suggestion, I think the prompts on the page are entirely redundant. Why not get rid of all instances of "PS C:\>" and "PS cert:\LocalMachine\My>"? That'll make the page more readable.

Edit: Same goes for #1649, #1648, #1647, #1646, #1645, #1644, #1643, and #1641.

True, but I stayed consistent with all the other snippets on all the other pages.
That's something bigger to handle than this PR.

[skycommand]

True, but I stayed consistent with all the other snippets on all the other pages.

True, but as a principle, I'd stay away from adding the prompt when only one or two commands are shown without their output, or even when their output lacks significance. Still, it was just a suggestion. That's all.

That's something bigger to handle than this PR.

Yes, but you don't need to psych yourself out over other such stuff being in existence. As long as you're doing volunteer work here, you can change the world one click at a time. And like I said before, no pressure! It was just a suggestion.

[o0nj]

@Styxxy Thank you for your multiple contributions overall. Would you please update the target branch of your PRs to master? We would like to proceed with the review.

[Styxxy]

@Styxxy Thank you for your multiple contributions overall. Would you please update the target branch of your PRs to master? We would like to proceed with the review.

Interesting... I did my forking and PR's from GitHub web ui, and it defaulted to the "live" branch. (Might be the "edit" links from the docs pages that redirect to the live branch instead of the master branch?)

@e0i I switched the base branch (of the PR) to master.

[opbld34]

Docs Build status updates of commit dbf4f7c:

✅ Validation status: passed

File	Status	Preview URL	Details
docset/windows/pkiclient/Get-Certificate.md	✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

Note: If you changed an existing file name or deleted a file, broken links in other files to the deleted or renamed file are listed only in the full build report.

[o0nj]

@dariomws306 @get-itips

Peer review needed for this PR. Thanks.