-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Sentry] Error: Internal JSON-RPC error. #20315
Comments
Events in past 14 days: 731 |
The error indicates an internal JSON-RPC error with MetaMask. In this particular case, the error mentions that the transaction reverted without a reason string. This often means that the smart contract's function was called with parameters or in a state that caused it to fail, but no specific error message was provided by the contract. |
There are actually multiple different errors being grouped in here. Examples:
It seems that these cases are all a result of errors coming from the network provider. As a first step with this task, we should probably focus on having the errors properly reported in sentry, with the |
Sentry issue: METAMASK-X7G7 |
Next step suggested by @danjm would be a good topic to prioritise in a future Sentry sprint. |
Sentry issue: METAMASK-X7T3 |
Sentry Issue: METAMASK-X7MY |
Sentry Issue: METAMASK-X8DR |
Related issue: #5907 |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity in the last 90 days. It will be closed in 45 days if there is no further activity. The MetaMask team intends on reviewing this issue before close, and removing the stale label if it is still a bug. We welcome new comments on this issue. We do not intend on closing issues if they report bugs that are still reproducible. Thank you for your contributions. |
Example steps to reproduce in this issue (switching network multiple times): #25785 |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity in the last 90 days. It will be closed in 45 days if there is no further activity. The MetaMask team intends on reviewing this issue before close, and removing the stale label if it is still a bug. We welcome new comments on this issue. We do not intend on closing issues if they report bugs that are still reproducible. Thank you for your contributions. |
Sentry Issue: METAMASK-X62Q
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: