[MLIR][IR] Add easy-builder to simplify IR building in C++ #2

Menooker · 2024-04-29T09:20:10Z

Rendered doc: https://github.com/Menooker/llvm-project/blob/easy_build/mlir/docs/EasyBuilder.md

Menooker · 2024-04-29T09:23:00Z

@ciyongch @ZhennanQin Would you please help to review this upstream PR? Thanks!

ciyongch · 2024-04-30T05:10:28Z

It looks simple and straightforward on the new expression, but it still requires to convert the original Value to WrappedValue (like auto x1 = b(x, ComputeType::Signed);), besides it only covers part of arith ops, so it might result in mixing the supported ops and unsupported ops like builder.create<arith::otherOp> and builder.create<math::someOp>, I would suggest to keep this wrapper in downstream at the moment and upstream in future when it's mature?

Menooker · 2024-04-30T11:29:09Z

Regarding WrappedValue, we need it because the MLIR type system lacks the signess flag on int types. That’s why we need wrappedvalue in the first place. Regarding dialect coverage, I would like to submit a series of PRs for 1) Basic easybuilder, builder states. etc., 2) operator overloading on arith 3) generic dialect op easybuild in function style, e.g. easybuild::F<math::SinOp>(wrappedvalue) 4) easy build for generic structed control flow like if and for. Part 1) and 2) are in this PR. Also note that we only need C++ operator overloading on arith operators. Other ops will be implemented in part 3

Menooker · 2024-05-08T06:26:17Z

Added doc https://github.com/Menooker/llvm-project/blob/easy_build/mlir/docs/EasyBuilder.md

…e exception specification of a function (llvm#90760) [temp.deduct.general] p6 states: > At certain points in the template argument deduction process it is necessary to take a function type that makes use of template parameters and replace those template parameters with the corresponding template arguments. This is done at the beginning of template argument deduction when any explicitly specified template arguments are substituted into the function type, and again at the end of template argument deduction when any template arguments that were deduced or obtained from default arguments are substituted. [temp.deduct.general] p7 goes on to say: > The _deduction substitution loci_ are > - the function type outside of the _noexcept-specifier_, > - the explicit-specifier, > - the template parameter declarations, and > - the template argument list of a partial specialization > > The substitution occurs in all types and expressions that are used in the deduction substitution loci. [...] Consider the following: ```cpp struct A { static constexpr bool x = true; }; template<typename T, typename U> void f(T, U) noexcept(T::x); // #1 template<typename T, typename U> void f(T, U*) noexcept(T::y); // #2 template<> void f<A>(A, int*) noexcept; // clang currently accepts, GCC and EDG reject ``` Currently, `Sema::SubstituteExplicitTemplateArguments` will substitute into the _noexcept-specifier_ when deducing template arguments from a function declaration or when deducing template arguments for taking the address of a function template (and the substitution is treated as a SFINAE context). In the above example, `#1` is selected as the primary template because substitution of the explicit template arguments into the _noexcept-specifier_ of `#2` failed, which resulted in the candidate being ignored. This behavior is incorrect ([temp.deduct.general] note 4 says as much), and this patch corrects it by deferring all substitution into the _noexcept-specifier_ until it is instantiated. As part of the necessary changes to make this patch work, the instantiation of the exception specification of a function template specialization when taking the address of a function template is changed to only occur for the function selected by overload resolution per [except.spec] p13.1 (as opposed to being instantiated for every candidate).

…ined member functions & member function templates (llvm#88963) Consider the following snippet from the discussion of CWG2847 on the core reflector: ``` template<typename T> concept C = sizeof(T) <= sizeof(long); template<typename T> struct A { template<typename U> void f(U) requires C<U>; // #1, declares a function template void g() requires C<T>; // #2, declares a function template<> void f(char); // #3, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function }; template<> template<typename U> void A<short>::f(U) requires C<U>; // #4, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function template template<> template<> void A<int>::f(int); // llvm#5, an explicit specialization of a function template that declares a function template<> void A<long>::g(); // llvm#6, an explicit specialization of a function that declares a function ``` A number of problems exist: - Clang rejects `#4` because the trailing _requires-clause_ has `U` substituted with the wrong template parameter depth when `Sema::AreConstraintExpressionsEqual` is called to determine whether it matches the trailing _requires-clause_ of the implicitly instantiated function template. - Clang rejects `llvm#5` because the function template specialization instantiated from `A<int>::f` has a trailing _requires-clause_, but `llvm#5` does not (nor can it have one as it isn't a templated function). - Clang rejects `llvm#6` for the same reasons it rejects `llvm#5`. This patch resolves these issues by making the following changes: - To fix `#4`, `Sema::AreConstraintExpressionsEqual` is passed `FunctionTemplateDecl`s when comparing the trailing _requires-clauses_ of `#4` and the function template instantiated from `#1`. - To fix `llvm#5` and `llvm#6`, the trailing _requires-clauses_ are not compared for explicit specializations that declare functions. In addition to these changes, `CheckMemberSpecialization` now considers constraint satisfaction/constraint partial ordering when determining which member function is specialized by an explicit specialization of a member function for an implicit instantiation of a class template (we previously would select the first function that has the same type as the explicit specialization). With constraints taken under consideration, we match EDG's behavior for these declarations.

...which caused issues like > ==42==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to deallocate 0x32 (50) bytes at address 0x117e0000 (error code: 28) > ==42==Cannot dump memory map on emscriptenAddressSanitizer: CHECK failed: sanitizer_common.cpp:81 "((0 && "unable to unmmap")) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0) (tid=288045824) > #0 0x14f73b0c in __asan::CheckUnwind()+0x14f73b0c (this.program+0x14f73b0c) > #1 0x14f8a3c2 in __sanitizer::CheckFailed(char const*, int, char const*, unsigned long long, unsigned long long)+0x14f8a3c2 (this.program+0x14f8a3c2) > #2 0x14f7d6e1 in __sanitizer::ReportMunmapFailureAndDie(void*, unsigned long, int, bool)+0x14f7d6e1 (this.program+0x14f7d6e1) > #3 0x14f81fbd in __sanitizer::UnmapOrDie(void*, unsigned long)+0x14f81fbd (this.program+0x14f81fbd) > #4 0x14f875df in __sanitizer::SuppressionContext::ParseFromFile(char const*)+0x14f875df (this.program+0x14f875df) > llvm#5 0x14f74eab in __asan::InitializeSuppressions()+0x14f74eab (this.program+0x14f74eab) > llvm#6 0x14f73a1a in __asan::AsanInitInternal()+0x14f73a1a (this.program+0x14f73a1a) when trying to use an ASan suppressions file under Emscripten: Even though it would be considered OK by SUSv4, the Emscripten runtime states "We don't support partial munmapping" (see <emscripten-core/emscripten@f4115eb> "Implement MAP_ANONYMOUS on top of malloc in STANDALONE_WASM mode (llvm#16289)"). Co-authored-by: Stephan Bergmann <stephan.bergmann@allotropia.de>

…ication as used during partial ordering (llvm#91534) We do not deduce template arguments from the exception specification when determining the primary template of a function template specialization or when taking the address of a function template. Therefore, this patch changes `isAtLeastAsSpecializedAs` such that we do not mark template parameters in the exception specification as 'used' during partial ordering (per [temp.deduct.partial] p12) to prevent the following from being ambiguous: ``` template<typename T, typename U> void f(U) noexcept(noexcept(T())); // #1 template<typename T> void f(T*) noexcept; // #2 template<> void f<int>(int*) noexcept; // currently ambiguous, selects #2 with this patch applied ``` Although there is no corresponding wording in the standard (see core issue filed here cplusplus/CWG#537), this seems to be the intended behavior given the definition of _deduction substitution loci_ in [temp.deduct.general] p7 (and EDG does the same thing).

…erSize (llvm#67657)" This reverts commit f0b3654. This commit triggers UB by reading an uninitialized variable. `UP.PartialThreshold` is used uninitialized in `getUnrollingPreferences()` when it is called from `LoopVectorizationPlanner::executePlan()`. In this case the `UP` variable is created on the stack and its fields are not initialized. ``` ==8802==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 0x557c0b081b99 in llvm::BasicTTIImplBase<llvm::X86TTIImpl>::getUnrollingPreferences(llvm::Loop*, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo::UnrollingPreferences&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter*) llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/BasicTTIImpl.h #1 0x557c0b07a40c in llvm::TargetTransformInfo::Model<llvm::X86TTIImpl>::getUnrollingPreferences(llvm::Loop*, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo::UnrollingPreferences&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter*) llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.h:2277:17 #2 0x557c0f5d69ee in llvm::TargetTransformInfo::getUnrollingPreferences(llvm::Loop*, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo::UnrollingPreferences&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter*) const llvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.cpp:387:19 #3 0x557c0e6b96a0 in llvm::LoopVectorizationPlanner::executePlan(llvm::ElementCount, unsigned int, llvm::VPlan&, llvm::InnerLoopVectorizer&, llvm::DominatorTree*, bool, llvm::DenseMap<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::SCEV const*, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*>> const*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:7624:7 #4 0x557c0e6e4b63 in llvm::LoopVectorizePass::processLoop(llvm::Loop*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:10253:13 llvm#5 0x557c0e6f2429 in llvm::LoopVectorizePass::runImpl(llvm::Function&, llvm::ScalarEvolution&, llvm::LoopInfo&, llvm::TargetTransformInfo&, llvm::DominatorTree&, llvm::BlockFrequencyInfo*, llvm::TargetLibraryInfo*, llvm::DemandedBits&, llvm::AssumptionCache&, llvm::LoopAccessInfoManager&, llvm::OptimizationRemarkEmitter&, llvm::ProfileSummaryInfo*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:10344:30 llvm#6 0x557c0e6f2f97 in llvm::LoopVectorizePass::run(llvm::Function&, llvm::AnalysisManager<llvm::Function>&) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:10383:9 [...] Uninitialized value was created by an allocation of 'UP' in the stack frame #0 0x557c0e6b961e in llvm::LoopVectorizationPlanner::executePlan(llvm::ElementCount, unsigned int, llvm::VPlan&, llvm::InnerLoopVectorizer&, llvm::DominatorTree*, bool, llvm::DenseMap<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::SCEV const*, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::Value*>> const*) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp:7623:3 ```

…vm#90820) This solves some ambuguity introduced in P0522 regarding how template template parameters are partially ordered, and should reduce the negative impact of enabling `-frelaxed-template-template-args` by default. When performing template argument deduction, a template template parameter containing no packs should be more specialized than one that does. Given the following example: ```C++ template<class T2> struct A; template<template<class ...T3s> class TT1, class T4> struct A<TT1<T4>>; // #1 template<template<class T5 > class TT2, class T6> struct A<TT2<T6>>; // #2 template<class T1> struct B; template struct A<B<char>>; ``` Prior to P0522, candidate `#2` would be more specialized. After P0522, neither is more specialized, so this becomes ambiguous. With this change, `#2` becomes more specialized again, maintaining compatibility with pre-P0522 implementations. The problem is that in P0522, candidates are at least as specialized when matching packs to fixed-size lists both ways, whereas before, a fixed-size list is more specialized. This patch keeps the original behavior when checking template arguments outside deduction, but restores this aspect of pre-P0522 matching during deduction. --- Since this changes provisional implementation of CWG2398 which has not been released yet, and already contains a changelog entry, we don't provide a changelog entry here.

'reduction' has a few restrictions over normal 'var-list' clauses: 1- On parallel, a num_gangs can only have 1 argument when combined with reduction. These two aren't able to be combined on any other of the compute constructs however. 2- The vars all must be 'numerical data types' types of some sort, or a 'composite of numerical data types'. A list of types is given in the standard as a minimum, so we choose 'isScalar', which covers all of these types and keeps types that are actually numeric. Other compilers don't seem to implement the 'composite of numerical data types', though we do. 3- Because of the above restrictions, member-of-composite is not allowed, so any access via a memberexpr is disallowed. Array-element and sub-arrays (aka array sections) are both permitted, so long as they meet the requirements of #2. This patch implements all of these for compute constructs.

…llvm#92855) This solves some ambuguity introduced in P0522 regarding how template template parameters are partially ordered, and should reduce the negative impact of enabling `-frelaxed-template-template-args` by default. When performing template argument deduction, we extend the provisional wording introduced in llvm#89807 so it also covers deduction of class templates. Given the following example: ```C++ template <class T1, class T2 = float> struct A; template <class T3> struct B; template <template <class T4> class TT1, class T5> struct B<TT1<T5>>; // #1 template <class T6, class T7> struct B<A<T6, T7>>; // #2 template struct B<A<int>>; ``` Prior to P0522, `#2` was picked. Afterwards, this became ambiguous. This patch restores the pre-P0522 behavior, `#2` is picked again. This has the beneficial side effect of making the following code valid: ```C++ template<class T, class U> struct A {}; A<int, float> v; template<template<class> class TT> void f(TT<int>); // OK: TT picks 'float' as the default argument for the second parameter. void g() { f(v); } ``` --- Since this changes provisional implementation of CWG2398 which has not been released yet, and already contains a changelog entry, we don't provide a changelog entry here.

…_build

yifeizh2 · 2024-06-13T08:54:09Z

mlir/include/mlir/IR/EasyBuildSCF.h

+
+} // namespace impl
+
+impl::IfSimulator makeIfRange(const EasyBuilder &s, Operation *op) {


Missing an inline here which might cause multiple definition~

yifeizh2 · 2024-06-13T08:54:58Z

mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Arith/Utils/EasyBuild.h

+}
+
+#define DEF_EASYBUILD_CMP_OPERATOR(OP, OPCLASS, TYPE, PRED)                    \
+  EBUnsigned operator OP(const TYPE &a, const TYPE &b) {                       \


also missing an inline here?

Thanks for finding！

…lvm#104148) `hasOperands` does not always execute matchers in the order they are written. This can cause issue in code using bindings when one operand matcher is relying on a binding set by the other. With this change, the first matcher present in the code is always executed first and any binding it sets are available to the second matcher. Simple example with current version (1 match) and new version (2 matches): ```bash > cat tmp.cpp int a = 13; int b = ((int) a) - a; int c = a - ((int) a); > clang-query tmp.cpp clang-query> set traversal IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource clang-query> m binaryOperator(hasOperands(cStyleCastExpr(has(declRefExpr(hasDeclaration(valueDecl().bind("d"))))), declRefExpr(hasDeclaration(valueDecl(equalsBoundNode("d")))))) Match #1: tmp.cpp:1:1: note: "d" binds here int a = 13; ^~~~~~~~~~ tmp.cpp:2:9: note: "root" binds here int b = ((int)a) - a; ^~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 match. > ./build/bin/clang-query tmp.cpp clang-query> set traversal IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource clang-query> m binaryOperator(hasOperands(cStyleCastExpr(has(declRefExpr(hasDeclaration(valueDecl().bind("d"))))), declRefExpr(hasDeclaration(valueDecl(equalsBoundNode("d")))))) Match #1: tmp.cpp:1:1: note: "d" binds here 1 | int a = 13; | ^~~~~~~~~~ tmp.cpp:2:9: note: "root" binds here 2 | int b = ((int)a) - a; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ Match #2: tmp.cpp:1:1: note: "d" binds here 1 | int a = 13; | ^~~~~~~~~~ tmp.cpp:3:9: note: "root" binds here 3 | int c = a - ((int)a); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ 2 matches. ``` If this should be documented or regression tested anywhere please let me know where.

…104523) Compilers and language runtimes often use helper functions that are fundamentally uninteresting when debugging anything but the compiler/runtime itself. This patch introduces a user-extensible mechanism that allows for these frames to be hidden from backtraces and automatically skipped over when navigating the stack with `up` and `down`. This does not affect the numbering of frames, so `f <N>` will still provide access to the hidden frames. The `bt` output will also print a hint that frames have been hidden. My primary motivation for this feature is to hide thunks in the Swift programming language, but I'm including an example recognizer for `std::function::operator()` that I wished for myself many times while debugging LLDB. rdar://126629381 Example output. (Yes, my proof-of-concept recognizer could hide even more frames if we had a method that returned the function name without the return type or I used something that isn't based off regex, but it's really only meant as an example). before: ``` (lldb) thread backtrace --filtered=false * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame #1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame #2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame #3: 0x0000000100003968 a.out`std::__1::__function::__alloc_func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff280, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:171:12 frame #4: 0x00000001000026bc a.out`std::__1::__function::__func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()(this=0x000000016fdff278, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:313:10 frame llvm#5: 0x0000000100003c38 a.out`std::__1::__function::__value_func<int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff278, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) const at function.h:430:12 frame llvm#6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame llvm#7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame llvm#8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 (lldb) ``` after ``` (lldb) bt * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10 frame #1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25 frame #2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12 frame llvm#6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10 frame llvm#7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10 frame llvm#8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476 Note: Some frames were hidden by frame recognizers ```

) Currently, process of replacing bitwise operations consisting of `LSR`/`LSL` with `And` is performed by `DAGCombiner`. However, in certain cases, the `AND` generated by this process can be removed. Consider following case: ``` lsr x8, x8, llvm#56 and x8, x8, #0xfc ldr w0, [x2, x8] ret ``` In this case, we can remove the `AND` by changing the target of `LDR` to `[X2, X8, LSL #2]` and right-shifting amount change to 56 to 58. after changed: ``` lsr x8, x8, llvm#58 ldr w0, [x2, x8, lsl #2] ret ``` This patch checks to see if the `SHIFTING` + `AND` operation on load target can be optimized and optimizes it if it can.

`JITDylibSearchOrderResolver` local variable can be destroyed before completion of all callbacks. Capture it together with `Deps` in `OnEmitted` callback. Original error: ``` ==2035==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-return on address 0x7bebfa155b70 at pc 0x7ff2a9a88b4a bp 0x7bec08d51980 sp 0x7bec08d51978 READ of size 8 at 0x7bebfa155b70 thread T87 (tf_xla-cpu-llvm) #0 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in operator() llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer.cpp:55:58 #1 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in __invoke<(lambda at llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer.cpp:55:9) &, const llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void> >, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void> > > > &> libcxx/include/__type_traits/invoke.h:149:25 #2 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in __call<(lambda at llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer.cpp:55:9) &, const llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void> >, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::orc::JITDylib *, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void> > > > &> libcxx/include/__type_traits/invoke.h:224:5 #3 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in operator() libcxx/include/__functional/function.h:210:12 #4 0x7ff2a9a88b49 in void std::__u::__function::__policy_invoker<void (llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, ```

Static destructor can race with calls to notify and trigger tsan warning. ``` WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=5787) Write of size 1 at 0x55bec9df8de8 by thread T23: #0 pthread_mutex_destroy [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:1344](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp?l=1344&cl=669089572):3 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x1b12affb) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c) #1 __libcpp_recursive_mutex_destroy [third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__thread/support/pthread.h:91](third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__thread/support/pthread.h?l=91&cl=669089572):10 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x4523d4e9) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c) #2 std::__tsan::recursive_mutex::~recursive_mutex() [third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/src/mutex.cpp:52](third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/src/mutex.cpp?l=52&cl=669089572):11 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x4523d4e9) #3 ~SmartMutex [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Mutex.h:28](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Mutex.h?l=28&cl=669089572):11 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcaedfe) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c) #4 (anonymous namespace)::PerfJITEventListener::~PerfJITEventListener() [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp:65](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp?l=65&cl=669089572):3 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcaedfe) llvm#5 cxa_at_exit_callback_installed_at(void*) [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:437](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp?l=437&cl=669089572):3 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x1b172cb9) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c) llvm#6 llvm::JITEventListener::createPerfJITEventListener() [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp:496](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp?l=496&cl=669089572):3 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcad8f5) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c) ``` ``` Previous atomic read of size 1 at 0x55bec9df8de8 by thread T192 (mutexes: write M0, write M1): #0 pthread_mutex_unlock [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp:1387](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_interceptors_posix.cpp?l=1387&cl=669089572):3 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x1b12b6bb) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c) #1 __libcpp_recursive_mutex_unlock [third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__thread/support/pthread.h:87](third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__thread/support/pthread.h?l=87&cl=669089572):10 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x4523d589) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c) #2 std::__tsan::recursive_mutex::unlock() [third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/src/mutex.cpp:64](third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/src/mutex.cpp?l=64&cl=669089572):11 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x4523d589) #3 unlock [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Mutex.h:47](third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Mutex.h?l=47&cl=669089572):16 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcaf968) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c) #4 ~lock_guard [third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__mutex/lock_guard.h:39](third_party/crosstool/v18/stable/src/libcxx/include/__mutex/lock_guard.h?l=39&cl=669089572):101 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcaf968) llvm#5 (anonymous namespace)::PerfJITEventListener::notifyObjectLoaded(unsigned long, llvm::object::ObjectFile const&, llvm::RuntimeDyld::LoadedObjectInfo const&) [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp:290](https://cs.corp.google.com/piper///depot/google3/third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/PerfJITEvents/PerfJITEventListener.cpp?l=290&cl=669089572):1 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bcaf968) llvm#6 llvm::orc::RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer::onObjEmit(llvm::orc::MaterializationResponsibility&, llvm::object::OwningBinary<llvm::object::ObjectFile>, std::__tsan::unique_ptr<llvm::RuntimeDyld::MemoryManager, std::__tsan::default_delete<llvm::RuntimeDyld::MemoryManager>>, std::__tsan::unique_ptr<llvm::RuntimeDyld::LoadedObjectInfo, std::__tsan::default_delete<llvm::RuntimeDyld::LoadedObjectInfo>>, std::__tsan::unique_ptr<llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void>>, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void>>>>, std::__tsan::default_delete<llvm::DenseMap<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void>>, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, void>, llvm::detail::DenseMapPair<llvm::orc::JITDylib*, llvm::DenseSet<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, llvm::DenseMapInfo<llvm::orc::SymbolStringPtr, void>>>>>>, llvm::Error) [third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer.cpp:386](https://cs.corp.google.com/piper///depot/google3/third_party/llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer.cpp?l=386&cl=669089572):10 (be1eb158bb70fc9cf7be2db70407e512890e5c6e20720cd88c69d7d9c26ea531_0200d5f71908+0x2bc404a8) (BuildId: ff25ace8b17d9863348bb1759c47246c) ```

add

c6fe08e

Mei, Yijie added 3 commits May 6, 2024 15:25

static type

15ab9b3

add call

b3d4d46

add doc

be3c460

add operators

0936244

Menooker mentioned this pull request May 9, 2024

[MLIR][IR] Add easy-builder to simplify IR building in C++ intel/graph-compiler#52

Open

Menooker changed the title ~~[MLIR][Arith] Add easy-builder to simplify IR building in C++~~ [MLIR][IR] Add easy-builder to simplify IR building in C++ May 9, 2024

Mei, Yijie added 3 commits June 12, 2024 16:47

update

62f7266

Merge branch 'main' of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project into easy…

fd0c103

…_build

fix

704e683

yifeizh2 reviewed Jun 13, 2024

View reviewed changes

fix comment

36192b4

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

[MLIR][IR] Add easy-builder to simplify IR building in C++ #2

[MLIR][IR] Add easy-builder to simplify IR building in C++ #2

Uh oh!

Menooker commented Apr 29, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

Menooker commented Apr 29, 2024

Uh oh!

ciyongch commented Apr 30, 2024

Uh oh!

Menooker commented Apr 30, 2024 via email

Uh oh!

Menooker commented May 8, 2024

Uh oh!

yifeizh2 Jun 13, 2024

Uh oh!

yifeizh2 Jun 13, 2024

Uh oh!

Menooker Jun 14, 2024

Uh oh!

Uh oh!


		} // namespace impl

		impl::IfSimulator makeIfRange(const EasyBuilder &s, Operation *op) {

[MLIR][IR] Add easy-builder to simplify IR building in C++ #2

Are you sure you want to change the base?

[MLIR][IR] Add easy-builder to simplify IR building in C++ #2

Uh oh!

Conversation

Menooker commented Apr 29, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Menooker commented Apr 29, 2024

Uh oh!

ciyongch commented Apr 30, 2024

Uh oh!

Menooker commented Apr 30, 2024 via email

Uh oh!

Menooker commented May 8, 2024

Uh oh!

yifeizh2 Jun 13, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

yifeizh2 Jun 13, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Menooker Jun 14, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Menooker commented Apr 29, 2024 •

edited

Loading