Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Overhaul MultivariateExpansion #338

Open
dannys4 opened this issue May 17, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Overhaul MultivariateExpansion #338

dannys4 opened this issue May 17, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@dannys4
Copy link
Contributor

dannys4 commented May 17, 2023

This is now an old conversation, but in 1.0 we (matt) figured out how to create maps that were efficient to evaluate and invert. In 2.0 I mostly focused on creating the ability to train and research uses of maps. In the future (e.g. 3.0) I want to get it to a point where we are able to research and experiment with different parameterizations of the maps themselves (this was elegantly put by Matt in our last conversation).

This entails making MultivariateExpansion and the like more friendly to tweak and call from the binding language and, additionally, creating the ability to call the binding language from C++ for univariate or multivariate members of the expansion. Then, we don't have to worry as much about implementing things in straight C++ efficiently the first time around, and we can really experiment with different abilities. As an example, it would be really cool/nice to be able to just throw in a Pytorch/Tensorflow neural network in a component and be able to use it for our map.

@dannys4 dannys4 added the enhancement New feature or request label May 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant