Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch from xz to pigz for analyze-outcomes #150

Open
daverodgman opened this issue Jan 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Switch from xz to pigz for analyze-outcomes #150

daverodgman opened this issue Jan 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority-high size-s Estimated task size: small (~2d)

Comments

@daverodgman
Copy link
Contributor

Follow-up to #144 - evaluate use of pigz as this appears to outperform xz -0 on both speed and size. If it's a win, get it installed on the CI and switch over to this instead.

@daverodgman daverodgman added enhancement New feature or request size-s Estimated task size: small (~2d) priority-high labels Jan 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority-high size-s Estimated task size: small (~2d)
Projects
Status: CI perf
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant