Suggestion: Add BigDecimal.shouldBeCloseTo

[ChristianIvicevic]

I ran into a scenario wherein I'd like to assert a BigDecimal to be within range of a target value with a specified error margin. Thus I added the following custom extension:

fun BigDecimal.shouldBeCloseTo(
    target: BigDecimal,
    error: BigDecimal
) = shouldBeInRange(target - error, target + error)

I expected this to already be a part of the library, but it wasn't. Have you considered adding this to the library?

[MarkusAmshove]

That would be a great addition and I will gladly merge a PR if you're willing to contribute :-)

[ChristianIvicevic]

I'll be looking into it, it will take slightly more work for the other numerical types to make it possibly generic if possible, but I'd like to contribute nonetheless once I find the time.

[MarkusAmshove]

Thank you for the contribution. I've just released it as v1.55 :-)