-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 205
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Azure Kinect calibration problem #40
Comments
Hi, Did you compile in Debug or Release? When compiling in Debug mode the calibration can be very slow. Let me know if changing to Release worked. Thanks, Marek |
Thanks for your reply. I'm sure it was compiled in Release version. Maybe the calibration is too slow in my computer? the server is i7-8700+GTX1080. |
Hi, Sorry, forgot to reply to your previous message. The calibration should be very fast in Release, ~1 second. Your config looks good. Some more things to make sure of:
If you can, send me screenshot from the client, maybe something will look off. Thanks, Marek |
Amazing!! After adding white border around the marker, the calibration succeeded. However, the average FPS in Show live is under 5, is it normal? as the demo says it could runs at 25 FPS. |
That's a bit slow. Can you try disabling filtering in the server settings? Also what is the fps in the client windows (you can see it on the bottom left)? |
I will try that. The client ran at 20-30 fps before connected to server, once calibrated, it dropped to about 4 fps. But saving and reading records seemed fine. By the way, could you provide a more specific doc on how to calibrate multiple Kinect with multiple markers? I think we can get better performance with 4 Azure Kinect from different views. I am not sure if it's alright to calculate transfer matrix using extrinsics of RGB camera. Thanks for your update! |
Hey @Zetee how good are the azure kinects quality? does the calibration of a person look better than the old kinects? could you upload a picture of how a person looks on your calibration setup as I was interested in purchasing the new kinects, but due to the price, I wanted to know the increase of quality. |
Hey @bustky Since I haven't used the old kinects, I can't tell you the improvement. But you can get high-quality RGB image (up to 4K), and more detailed depth image (1024x1024, 120°x120°) in this new one. Anyway, I am satisfied with it, and Microsoft even added external synchronization. Here is the image I get from 3 azure kinects. |
@Zetee , it's weird that the framerate drops after calibration. I'll try to look into it a bit more. In the meantime, could you check if you see a memory leak when you get the slowdown? As for the multiple marker calibration: I presume you took a look at the manual in the docs section. Is there anything specific that is not clear and I should add? |
@MarekKowalski No memory leak, but CPU usage is above 90%. |
I have some time reserved for looking into this new branch tomorrow, so I'll try to see if I can get a repro of the 90% CPU. Could you also tell me which process does the 90%? Is this the client? As for multiple markers:
Does that make sense? I'll try to update the manual as I keep working on the Azure Kinect version, but it may take some time. |
@Zetee I fixed a memory leak bug today, but unfortunately I was unable to get a repro on the 90% CPU. Could you give me the settings file you are using as well as the exact repro? How many Kinects are you using? Thanks, Marek |
@MarekKowalski Thanks for your updating. I think the high CPU usage is that I started multiple clients and server at the same computer. The 3D reconstruction is not my focus now, but I am interested in this topic. I am going to using PCL library for uncalibrated registration if not busy. |
Hello, may I ask what coordinates are filled in under Bounding box and calibration marekers in calibration mode? In addition, I would like to ask if I can add multiple calibration markers under calibration? |
The bounding box values are set in meters from the world origin (read: the marker). Min bound values should be negative, Max bound values positive. Just play around a bit with the values and watch the yellow box in the preview, you'll understand it quickly :) Regarding the markers: yes you can, please take a look here: |
Thanks for sharing this great work! I have compiled the Azure Kinects brunch and testing for two Azure Kinects. In calibration step, the clients can detect the same mark id 0 (green border around the marker in both clients), but after added mark id 0 in setting, calibrate never worked, as the green border didn't disappear and no calibration file generated. Do I need to add the orientation and translation info? I am really appreciated if you can give some suggestions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: