-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Python3 compatibility #18
Conversation
sufficient to have it greater or equal to get the property satisfied
order in the if branch is enough to the type checks unnecessary
Hi @AndreaCrotti, |
I'm sorry but I think you haven't understood the PR. I mean it's up to you, but not supporting Python3 in 2014 is almost as bad as not having a python SDK considering that none of the libraries you are using is not already been ported to Python3.. |
I guess this guy answering to you works on a 640K RAM computer ("640K ought to be enough for anybody" kind-of answer)... |
I really do not understand why you don't want your SDK to be comatible with Python 3 AND Python 2 (as the pull request is designed for)? |
@ilann : try Stripe.com for instance, their API is great, and believe me or not, compatible Python 3 (yes, really !) |
Hi everyone, sorry for the lack of news. We're just getting this signed off by our developers and we'll update the SDK as soon as we can. |
Hello again everyone. As you can see from this commit 210c313 the SDK is now Python 2.7 and 3 compatible :-) |
Few simple fixes to support Python3 and add a tox.ini to easily test python2.7/3.3/3.4