Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct for nonlinear phase offsets between receivers #147

Open
d3v-null opened this issue Sep 20, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Correct for nonlinear phase offsets between receivers #147

d3v-null opened this issue Sep 20, 2023 · 3 comments
Milestone

Comments

@d3v-null
Copy link
Collaborator

this thingy
PhaseCorrection.txt
Problem_in_cal_solution
S21_phase_response

@d3v-null
Copy link
Collaborator Author

d3v-null commented Oct 18, 2023

basically everything has whitening except RG6_90 and ANY RFOF

@andreww5au
Copy link

I would say 'Every cable flavour starting with 'RG6', except for 'RG6_90' and 'everything starting with LMR'. Whenever we define a new cable flavour, it will start with 'RG6', or 'LMR400' (both of which refer to the physical coaxial cable type), or 'RFOF'. For coax cables, the 'RG6' or 'LMR_400' in the cable flavour name is followed by _NNN with the nominal physical length. For fibre cables, we don't bother including the length in the cable flavour name, because it has no effect on the losses as a function of frequency (the fibre has a 'flat' response). If you base your test on just the first few letters of the flavour name, it'll still work if we add 'RFOF-EDA2', or 'LMR400_150', etc, at some point in the future.

@d3v-null d3v-null changed the title Apply "receiver type" phase correction Correct for nonlinear phase offsets between receivers Nov 12, 2024
@d3v-null
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Instead of the static text file, we will use mwalib 1.5.0 to read the signal chain corrections from the metafits.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants