Skip to content

added mindgames (tom) #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 9, 2023
Merged

added mindgames (tom) #2

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ For the **latest version** of the paper, keep an eye on the [releases](https://g

#### Natural language understanding

##### Setiment analysis
##### Sentiment analysis
1. Holistic evaluation of language models. _Percy Liang et al._ arXiv 2022. [[paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.09110)]
2. Can chatgpt forecast stock price movements? return predictability and large language models. _Alejandro Lopez-Lira et al._ SSRN 2023. [[paper](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4412788)]
3. Is chatgpt a general-purpose natural language processing task solver? _Chengwei Qin et al._ arXiv 2023. [[paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.06476)]
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -120,6 +120,8 @@ For the **latest version** of the paper, keep an eye on the [releases](https://g
8. Are large language models really good logical reasoners? a comprehensive evaluation from deductive, inductive and abductive views. _Fangzhi Xu et al._ arXiv 2023. [[paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.09841)]
9. Evaluating the Logical Reasoning Ability of ChatGPT and GPT-4. _Hanmeng Liu et al._ arXiv 2023. [[paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.03439)]
10. A Systematic Study and Comprehensive Evaluation of ChatGPT on Benchmark Datasets, _Laskar et al._ ACL 2023 (Findings). [[paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18486)]
11. MindGames: Targeting Theory of Mind in Large Language Models with Dynamic Epistemic Modal Logic _Sileo et Lernould_ arXiv 2023. [[paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.03353)]


#### Natural language generation

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -359,4 +361,4 @@ If you find this project useful in your research or work, please consider citing

1. Tahmid Rahman ([@tahmedge](https://github.com/tahmedge)) for [PR#1](https://github.com/MLGroupJLU/LLM-eval-survey/pull/1).
2. Hao Zhao for suggestions on new benchmarks.
3. Chenhui Zhang for suggestions on robustness, ethics, and trustworthiness.
3. Chenhui Zhang for suggestions on robustness, ethics, and trustworthiness.