Replies: 3 comments
-
本来我是有过提交想法的,结果经不起考证 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
是的,这个规则库的内容必须要准确和客观,不然可能会遇到很多问题。最近也有发现现有的一些早期提交的规则不太准确,还在修正中。 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
后续现在也来了,字节赔了8266.8万给美摄,就因为抄代码🤣 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
由于字节跳动旗下公司与美摄公司打官司,致使libtt系列的so库(如libttvesdk)开发团队归属权定位模糊(名义上是字节跳动旗下的,名字上也确实是(按理来说标签划为VE SDK等等走个流程直接提交完事),但代码不完全是,这就很尴尬;而且不仅不是二创,指授权过,又或者遵守开源协议等等,然而它并没有,还是抄袭来的,侵害了软著和技术秘密),所以我个人倡议此系列so的Rules大家暂时一并不要提交为好(目前还没有人提交这个系列的)

以上仅代表个人看法及观点,可以忽略(无视且不必回复)。ps:可能有的人会觉得上述说辞莫名其妙/些许荒谬
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions