-
Which notation would you use to denote the 3rd layer’s activations when the input is the 7th example from the 8th minibatch?
- a^[3]{8}(7)
Note: [i]{j}(k) superscript means i-th layer, j-th minibatch, k-th example
-
Which of these statements about mini-batch gradient descent do you agree with?
- You should implement mini-batch gradient descent without an explicit for-loop over different mini-batches, so that the algorithm processes all mini-batches at the same time (vectorization).
- Training one epoch (one pass through the training set) using mini-batch gradient descent is faster than training one epoch using batch gradient descent.
- One iteration of mini-batch gradient descent (computing on a single mini-batch) is faster than one iteration of batch gradient descent.
Note: Vectorization is not for computing several mini-batches in the same time.
-
Why is the best mini-batch size usually not 1 and not m, but instead something in-between?
- If the mini-batch size is 1, you lose the benefits of vectorization across examples in the mini-batch.
- If the mini-batch size is m, you end up with batch gradient descent, which has to process the whole training set before making progress.
-
Suppose your learning algorithm’s cost J, plotted as a function of the number of iterations, looks like this:
- If you’re using mini-batch gradient descent, this looks acceptable. But if you’re using batch gradient descent, something is wrong.
Note: There will be some oscillations when you're using mini-batch gradient descent since there could be some noisy data example in batches. However batch gradient descent always guarantees a lower J before reaching the optimal.
-
Suppose the temperature in Casablanca over the first three days of January are the same:
Jan 1st: θ_1 = 10
Jan 2nd: θ_2 * 10
Say you use an exponentially weighted average with β = 0.5 to track the temperature: v_0 = 0, v_t = βv_t−1 + (1 − β)θ_t. If v_2 is the value computed after day 2 without bias correction, and v^corrected_2 is the value you compute with bias correction. What are these values?
- v_2 = 7.5, v^corrected_2 = 10
-
Which of these is NOT a good learning rate decay scheme? Here, t is the epoch number.
- α = e^t * α_0
Note: This will explode the learning rate rather than decay it.
-
You use an exponentially weighted average on the London temperature dataset. You use the following to track the temperature: v_t = βv_t−1 + (1 − β)θ_t. The red line below was computed using β = 0.9. What would happen to your red curve as you vary β? (Check the two that apply)
- Increasing β will shift the red line slightly to the right.
- Decreasing β will create more oscillation within the red line.
-
Consider this figure:
These plots were generated with gradient descent; with gradient descent with momentum (β = 0.5) and gradient descent with momentum (β = 0.9). Which curve corresponds to which algorithm?
(1) is gradient descent. (2) is gradient descent with momentum (small β). (3) is gradient descent with momentum (large β)
-
Suppose batch gradient descent in a deep network is taking excessively long to find a value of the parameters that achieves a small value for the cost function J(W[1],b[1],...,W[L],b[L]). Which of the following techniques could help find parameter values that attain a small value forJ? (Check all that apply)
- Try using Adam
- Try better random initialization for the weights
- Try tuning the learning rate α
- Try mini-batch gradient descent
- Try initializing all the weights to zero
-
Which of the following statements about Adam is False?
- Adam should be used with batch gradient computations, not with mini-batches.
Note: Adam could be used with both.
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 27, 2019. It is now read-only.