Skip to content

use src.nargs for validate_code! #58327

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 6, 2025
Merged

use src.nargs for validate_code! #58327

merged 2 commits into from
May 6, 2025

Conversation

aviatesk
Copy link
Member

@aviatesk aviatesk commented May 6, 2025

This is a follow-up to #54341.
Otherwise, validate_code! may raise wrong errors for unmatched nargs
information between generated code and original method.

@aviatesk aviatesk force-pushed the avi/validate-nargs branch 2 times, most recently from f486c9a to da76e14 Compare May 6, 2025 07:32
@aviatesk aviatesk requested a review from Keno May 6, 2025 07:32
aviatesk added 2 commits May 6, 2025 16:38
This is a follow-up to #54341.
Otherwise, `validate_code!` may raise wrong errors for unmatched `nargs`
information between generated code and original method.
@aviatesk aviatesk force-pushed the avi/validate-nargs branch from da76e14 to 4b29063 Compare May 6, 2025 07:41
@aviatesk aviatesk added the backport 1.12 Change should be backported to release-1.12 label May 6, 2025
@aviatesk aviatesk merged commit b43baa1 into master May 6, 2025
6 of 8 checks passed
@aviatesk aviatesk deleted the avi/validate-nargs branch May 6, 2025 11:06
aviatesk added a commit that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
This is a follow-up to #54341.
Otherwise, `validate_code!` may raise wrong errors for unmatched `nargs`
information between generated code and original method.
@aviatesk aviatesk mentioned this pull request May 6, 2025
53 tasks
@aviatesk aviatesk removed the backport 1.12 Change should be backported to release-1.12 label May 6, 2025
serenity4 pushed a commit to serenity4/julia that referenced this pull request May 7, 2025
This is a follow-up to JuliaLang#54341.
Otherwise, `validate_code!` may raise wrong errors for unmatched `nargs`
information between generated code and original method.
charleskawczynski pushed a commit to charleskawczynski/julia that referenced this pull request May 12, 2025
This is a follow-up to JuliaLang#54341.
Otherwise, `validate_code!` may raise wrong errors for unmatched `nargs`
information between generated code and original method.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants