Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move typeassert effect-free modeling to the proper place #43830

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2022

Conversation

Keno
Copy link
Member

@Keno Keno commented Jan 17, 2022

This was open-coded inside inlining, but the effect-free modeling
code should be with the other builtins (in preparation of calling
it from more places).

This was open-coded inside inlining, but the effect-free modeling
code should be with the other builtins (in preparation of calling
it from more places).
@vtjnash vtjnash merged commit 1f266b8 into master Jan 18, 2022
@vtjnash vtjnash deleted the kf/typeasserteffects branch January 18, 2022 19:22
@vtjnash
Copy link
Member

vtjnash commented Jan 18, 2022

Yep, this looks more consistent there now

N5N3 pushed a commit to N5N3/julia that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2022
…3830)

This was open-coded inside inlining, but the effect-free modeling
code should be with the other builtins (in preparation of calling
it from more places).
LilithHafner pushed a commit to LilithHafner/julia that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2022
…3830)

This was open-coded inside inlining, but the effect-free modeling
code should be with the other builtins (in preparation of calling
it from more places).
LilithHafner pushed a commit to LilithHafner/julia that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2022
…3830)

This was open-coded inside inlining, but the effect-free modeling
code should be with the other builtins (in preparation of calling
it from more places).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants