Closed
Description
foo(; args...)
Inside of a function with this signature, args
will be an array of tuples containing symbols and values. Cool, but the array will be unordered, so I pretty much have to loop over it trying to match symbols.
I think it would be really cool if args
came in as a dictionary. I'm guessing there would be some overhead involved in that, and that's perhaps why it has not been done. But I wonder if the overhead involved in looping over symbols and doing a bunch of string comparisons (I think that's what's happening, could be wrong) might even outweigh the dict creation.
I didn't see an issue, but has this been considered?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment