If you enter an expression in REPL that terminates with a comma , then it is parsed immediately after newline , e.g.

julia> x = 1,
(1,)

julia> 1, 2, 3,
(1, 2, 3)

However in Julia script after , Julia tries to read continuation of the expression from a new line, e.g.

julia> function f()
1,
1, 2, 3
end

julia> f()
(1, 1, 2, 3)

This is inconsistent. The problem is apparent when you have a code and you copy paste it into REPL.

E.g. in the example above copy-pasting only the body of f() into REPL produces:

julia> 1,
(1,)

julia> 1, 2, 3
(1, 2, 3)

I guess it is not intended as I would expect consistency between REPL?
I know that 100% consistency is not guaranteed - e.g. when multiple empty lines are present, but this case seems that it should give the same result