Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
πŸ€– [master] Bump the SparseArrays stdlib from b4b0e72 to 99c99b4 (#50634)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Stdlib: SparseArrays
URL: https://github.com/JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl.git
Stdlib branch: main
Julia branch: master
Old commit: b4b0e72
New commit: 99c99b4
Julia version: 1.11.0-DEV
SparseArrays version: 1.10.0 (Does not match)
Bump invoked by: @dkarrasch
Powered by:
[BumpStdlibs.jl](https://github.com/JuliaLang/BumpStdlibs.jl)

Diff:
JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl@b4b0e72...99c99b4

```
$ git log --oneline b4b0e72..99c99b4
99c99b4 Specialize 3-arg `dot` for sparse self-adjoint matrices (#398)
cb10c1e use unwrapping mechanism for triangular matrices (#396)
b3872c8 added warning for iterating while mutating a sparse matrix (#415)
f8f0f40 bring coverage of fixed SparseMatrixCSC to 100% (#392)
0eb9c04 fix typos (#414)
```

Co-authored-by: Dilum Aluthge <dilum@aluthge.com>
  • Loading branch information
DilumAluthgeBot and DilumAluthge authored Jul 22, 2023
1 parent c82656d commit 6691a75
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 5 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions.
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
b2ddca51d8d39c2869555229575451f2
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
cff167088056690a7c7453326bc1ad0ca0fcff9ffda85ebfd943ebad9684fc8134b0cda18dd70d8550de35493c6d9579b2fb51090b1c9718fa4290008c6d5f3f

This file was deleted.

This file was deleted.

2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion stdlib/SparseArrays.version
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
SPARSEARRAYS_BRANCH = main
SPARSEARRAYS_SHA1 = b4b0e721ada6e8cf5f6391aff4db307be69b0401
SPARSEARRAYS_SHA1 = 99c99b4521eb19a7973643d1aa4d7b1e4d50a6db
SPARSEARRAYS_GIT_URL := https://github.com/JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl.git
SPARSEARRAYS_TAR_URL = https://api.github.com/repos/JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl/tarball/$1

9 comments on commit 6691a75

@nanosoldier
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Executing the daily package evaluation, I will reply here when finished:

@nanosoldier runtests(isdaily = true)

@nanosoldier
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The package evaluation job you requested has completed - possible new issues were detected.
The full report is available.

@vtjnash
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nanosoldier runbenchmarks(ALL, isdaily = true)

@nanosoldier
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your benchmark job has completed - possible performance regressions were detected. A full report can be found here.

@vtjnash
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good for sparse, not for string?

["sparse", "sparse solves", "least squares (default), matrix rhs"]	0.11 (5%) βœ…	1.00 (1%)
["sparse", "sparse solves", "least squares (default), vector rhs"]	0.19 (5%) βœ…	1.00 (1%)
["sparse", "sparse solves", "least squares (qr), matrix rhs"]	0.11 (5%) βœ…	1.00 (1%)
["sparse", "sparse solves", "least squares (qr), vector rhs"]	0.19 (5%) βœ…	1.00 (1%)
["string", "join"]	2.02 (40%) ❌	1.00 (1%)

@vtjnash
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nanosoldier runbenchmarks("string" && "join", vs="@0f56da8988366dd60e170932eefca4adb890acff")

@nanosoldier
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your benchmark job has completed - no performance regressions were detected. A full report can be found here.

@vtjnash
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nanosoldier runbenchmarks("string", vs="@0f56da8988366dd60e170932eefca4adb890acff")

@nanosoldier
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your benchmark job has completed - no performance regressions were detected. A full report can be found here.

Please sign in to comment.