Skip to content

Skip Aqua tests when running make test-Distributed locally #129

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

DilumAluthge
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Comment on lines +6 to 12
# On GitHub Actions CI (on the Distributed.jl repo): yes we run Aqua.
# On Base Julia Buildkite CI (on the JuliaLang/julia repo): no Aqua
# When the user manually runs `make test-Distributed` locally: no Aqua
if Base.get_bool_env("GITHUB_ACTIONS", false)
@testset "Aqua.jl tests" begin
include("aqua.jl")
end
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This means pkg> test Distributed won't run Aqua tests.

I think I'd rather gate it on whether Aqua can be found.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 28, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.32%. Comparing base (8890288) to head (93cb4f7).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #129   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   79.32%   79.32%           
=======================================
  Files          10       10           
  Lines        1949     1949           
=======================================
  Hits         1546     1546           
  Misses        403      403           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@IanButterworth
Copy link
Member

Replaced by #130

@IanButterworth IanButterworth deleted the dpa/aqua-only-gha branch January 28, 2025 02:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants