You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have been playing around a bit and noticed that the Krawczyk contractor can be much faster than Newton (which is expected as it doesn't use an interval-valued jacobian). For example on the Smiley 5.5 example (4 dimensional):
julia>@timeroots(SmileyExample55.f, X ; contractor = Newton) ;
173.267635 seconds (95.31 M allocations:9.645 GiB, 2.81% gc time, 0.74% compilation time)
julia>@timeroots(SmileyExample55.f, X ; contractor = Krawczyk) ;
16.432576 seconds (8.03 M allocations:673.482 MiB, 0.51% gc time, 3.66% compilation time)
Therefore, I am tempted to make Krawczyk the default for v1.0.
I have been playing around a bit and noticed that the Krawczyk contractor can be much faster than Newton (which is expected as it doesn't use an interval-valued jacobian). For example on the Smiley 5.5 example (4 dimensional):
Therefore, I am tempted to make Krawczyk the default for v1.0.
Is there any reason not to do so ? @dpsanders @lbenet @lucaferranti
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: