Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refresh icon #6

Closed
cormullion opened this issue Oct 18, 2021 · 16 comments · Fixed by #75
Closed

Refresh icon #6

cormullion opened this issue Oct 18, 2021 · 16 comments · Fixed by #75
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@cormullion
Copy link
Contributor

Hi graphers! (graphistes?) Thank you for your efforts in migrating, maintaining, and updating this package, which so many of us find useful.

As a very minor contribution, here are some suggestions for a refreshed icon.

julia-graphs-logos

I noticed an oddity with the current icon. For some reason it's slightly transparent, which explains the subdued appearance when used with GitHub's Dark Mode.

Screenshot 2021-10-18 at 10 22 17

The current icon also uses the OG Julia duotone colour design, which was replaced by single colours sometime around v1.2.

@jpfairbanks
Copy link
Member

I really like option 4!

@etiennedeg
Copy link
Member

I personally like the old logo, with refreshed colors. It is more minimalist. Perhaps with smaller dots and slightly bigger edges, and with edges in another color (or with a background, like logos 1,4,5,6)

@ViralBShah
Copy link
Contributor

Is this the logo for the org or just the package?

@ViralBShah
Copy link
Contributor

ViralBShah commented Oct 18, 2021

Maybe @davpoolechem wants to use 6 for JuliaChem! Or perhaps @rkurchin may be interested for a chemistry use of that logo.

@jpfairbanks
Copy link
Member

Yeah the the 6th option really looks chemical! I like number 4 because it reminds me of a scaled down version of the Petersen Graph. We could combine option 4 and 5 and to get the 4-Petersen graph. a 4 clique connected to a 4 cycle.

@ViralBShah
Copy link
Contributor

I like 4 too.

@rkurchin
Copy link

Thanks for the ping, @ViralBShah! I may well be interested, and would also love to play with it myself, if @cormullion is happy to send the code for generating it along 😄

@cormullion
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rkurchin here - I found it too difficult to make a simple graph network that didn't look like a molecule. 😄

@cormullion
Copy link
Contributor Author

4 + 5
Screenshot 2021-10-19 at 15 50 50

@etiennedeg
Copy link
Member

I like this one, why not illustrating graph coloration (this one is 3 colorable) ?

@jpfairbanks
Copy link
Member

yeah if we rotate the colors on the outer square by 90deg clockwise, I think we can adopt this logo

@cormullion
Copy link
Contributor Author

Cool, thanks!

PNG:

julia-graphs

SVG: (zipped)
julia-graphs.svg.zip

Code:

https://gist.github.com/cormullion/b1f11b0eaba45252a11269e893e88df5

@gdalle gdalle added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request labels Nov 11, 2021
@gdalle
Copy link
Member

gdalle commented Nov 12, 2021

So should we change the profile picture of the org? And perhaps add it to the documentation of Graphs.jl?

@gdalle
Copy link
Member

gdalle commented Nov 12, 2021

I just have a question: is it just me or do the edges look slightly blurred? Is that the desired effect?

@cormullion
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, the faux 3D effect might look a bit blurry when seen large:

Screenshot 2021-11-12 at 11 36 09

But it's designed to work better when icon-sized:

Screenshot 2021-11-12 at 11 37 36

It can of course be taken to the bike-shed for further modification. 😃

@cormullion
Copy link
Contributor Author

Awesome, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants