We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PermutedDimsArray
Something is confused here, I'm pretty sure the rule gives the same result as the one for permutedims:
permutedims
julia> test_rrule(PermutedDimsArray, rand(3, 4, 5), (3, 1, 2); atol=0.1) test_rrule: PermutedDimsArray on Array{Float64, 3},Int64,Int64,Int64: Test Failed at /Users/me/.julia/packages/ChainRulesTestUtils/8dFTY/src/check_result.jl:24 Expression: isapprox(actual, expected; kwargs...) Evaluated: isapprox([0.02 2.61 -7.71 0.42; -8.68 -8.99 -3.53 -4.96; 8.23 -2.05 7.62 -0.88;;; -6.06 0.12 3.47 4.54; -0.02 7.06 -3.1 0.65; 0.47 -5.54 2.34 0.55;;; -4.3 -4.81 -0.08 4.66; -1.29 1.05 2.44 2.48; 3.17 -3.19 1.14 -5.52;;; -6.65 -6.25 8.15 -3.25; 3.51 -4.9 5.53 -2.8; -8.0 0.13 -7.71 1.46;;; 0.42 8.74 8.1 2.85; 0.9 2.67 3.36 -8.24; 0.95 -6.47 -5.11 8.27], [0.019999999999746908 -6.6500000000002375 -0.02000000000025288 0.8999999999997429; -6.060000000000144 0.41999999999974325 -1.2900000000002418 8.229999999999814; -4.300000000000264 -8.680000000000021 3.5099999999997613 0.469999999999744;;; 3.169999999999719 2.609999999999724 -6.250000000000212 7.059999999999704; -8.00000000000028 0.11999999999974628 8.739999999999668 1.0499999999997618; 0.9499999999997412 -4.8100000000002225 -8.990000000000263 -4.900000000000136;;; 2.66999999999973 -3.1900000000002566 -7.710000000000218 8.149999999999768; -2.0500000000002374 0.12999999999974626 3.4699999999997257 8.099999999999698; -5.540000000000103 -6.470000000000212 -0.08000000000025227 -3.5300000000002676;;; -3.1000000000002617 3.3599999999997268 1.1399999999997399 0.4199999999997444; 2.439999999999729 7.619999999999814 -7.710000000000186 4.5399999999997185; 5.529999999999713 2.3399999999996295 -5.1100000000002215 4.659999999999719;;; -3.2500000000002327 0.6499999999997431 -8.240000000000203 -5.520000000000219; 2.849999999999756 2.4799999999997318 -0.8800000000002475 1.459999999999738; -4.960000000000223 -2.800000000000235 0.5499999999997423 8.269999999999694]; rtol = 1.0e-9, atol = 0.1) Stacktrace: [1] test_approx(actual::Union{Number, AbstractArray{<:Number}}, expected::Union{Number, AbstractArray{<:Number}}, msg::Any; kwargs::Base.Pairs{Symbol, V, Tuple{Vararg{Symbol, N}}, NamedTuple{names, T}} where {V, N, names, T<:Tuple{Vararg{Any, N}}}) @ ChainRulesTestUtils ~/.julia/packages/ChainRulesTestUtils/8dFTY/src/check_result.jl:24 [2] _test_cotangent(accum_cotangent::Any, ad_cotangent::Any, fd_cotangent::Any; check_inferred::Any, kwargs::Base.Pairs{Symbol, V, Tuple{Vararg{Symbol, N}}, NamedTuple{names, T}} where {V, N, names, T<:Tuple{Vararg{Any, N}}}) @ ChainRulesTestUtils ~/.julia/packages/ChainRulesTestUtils/8dFTY/src/testers.jl:301 [3] (::ChainRulesTestUtils.var"#49#53"{Bool, NamedTuple{(:rtol, :atol), Tuple{Float64, Float64}}})(::Any, ::Vararg{Any}) @ ChainRulesTestUtils ~/.julia/packages/ChainRulesTestUtils/8dFTY/src/testers.jl:228 [4] #57 @ ./tuple.jl:556 [inlined] [5] BottomRF @ ./reduce.jl:81 [inlined] [6] _foldl_impl @ ./reduce.jl:62 [inlined] [7] foldl_impl @ ./reduce.jl:48 [inlined] [8] mapfoldl_impl(f::typeof(identity), op::Base.var"#57#58"{ChainRulesTestUtils.var"#49#53"{Bool, NamedTuple{(:rtol, :atol), Tuple{Float64, Float64}}}}, nt::Nothing, itr::Base.Iterators.Zip{Tuple{Tuple{NoTangent, Array{Float64, 3}, NoTangent}, Tuple{NoTangent, Array{Float64, 3}, NoTangent}, Tuple{NoTangent, Array{Float64, 3}, NoTangent}}}) @ Base ./reduce.jl:44 [9] mapfoldl(f::Function, op::Function, itr::Base.Iterators.Zip{Tuple{Tuple{NoTangent, Array{Float64, 3}, NoTangent}, Tuple{NoTangent, Array{Float64, 3}, NoTangent}, Tuple{NoTangent, Array{Float64, 3}, NoTangent}}}; init::Nothing) @ Base ./reduce.jl:162 [10] #foldl#259 @ ./reduce.jl:185 [inlined] [11] foreach(::Function, ::Tuple{NoTangent, Array{Float64, 3}, NoTangent}, ::Tuple{NoTangent, Array{Float64, 3}, NoTangent}, ::Vararg{Tuple{NoTangent, Array{Float64, 3}, NoTangent}}) @ Base ./tuple.jl:556 [12] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/packages/ChainRulesTestUtils/8dFTY/src/testers.jl:227 [inlined] [13] macro expansion @ ~/.julia/dev/julia/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.8/Test/src/Test.jl:1356 [inlined] [14] test_rrule(::RuleConfig, ::Any, ::Any, ::Vararg{Any}; output_tangent::Any, check_thunked_output_tangent::Any, fdm::Any, rrule_f::Any, check_inferred::Bool, fkwargs::NamedTuple, rtol::Real, atol::Real, kwargs::Base.Pairs{Symbol, V, Tuple{Vararg{Symbol, N}}, NamedTuple{names, T}} where {V, N, names, T<:Tuple{Vararg{Any, N}}}) @ ChainRulesTestUtils ~/.julia/packages/ChainRulesTestUtils/8dFTY/src/testers.jl:198 Test Summary: | Pass Fail Total Time test_rrule: PermutedDimsArray on Array{Float64, 3},Int64,Int64,Int64 | 7 1 8 0.0s ERROR: Some tests did not pass: 7 passed, 1 failed, 0 errored, 0 broken.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Something is confused here, I'm pretty sure the rule gives the same result as the one for
permutedims
:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: