Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tangent_type(primal_type) #634

Open
oxinabox opened this issue Oct 4, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

tangent_type(primal_type) #634

oxinabox opened this issue Oct 4, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
breaking a breaking change speculative fairly out there ideas for consideration in longer term Structural Tangent Related to the `Tangent` type for structured (composite) values
Milestone

Comments

@oxinabox
Copy link
Member

oxinabox commented Oct 4, 2023

Our life would be easier if we had a single canonical tangent type for any given primal type.
Wouldn't need to worry about having both natural and structural tangents needing to be supported.
Could require that a mapping (possibly via convert) from various forms to the single specified type was given.

Potentially this could be done in a nonbreaking way if it was required to use it, just preferred

@oxinabox oxinabox added speculative fairly out there ideas for consideration in longer term Structural Tangent Related to the `Tangent` type for structured (composite) values breaking a breaking change labels Oct 4, 2023
@oxinabox oxinabox added this to the v2 milestone Oct 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
breaking a breaking change speculative fairly out there ideas for consideration in longer term Structural Tangent Related to the `Tangent` type for structured (composite) values
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant