tangent_type(primal_type) #634
Labels
breaking
a breaking change
speculative
fairly out there ideas for consideration in longer term
Structural Tangent
Related to the `Tangent` type for structured (composite) values
Milestone
Our life would be easier if we had a single canonical tangent type for any given primal type.
Wouldn't need to worry about having both natural and structural tangents needing to be supported.
Could require that a mapping (possibly via
convert
) from various forms to the single specified type was given.Potentially this could be done in a nonbreaking way if it was required to use it, just preferred
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: