-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 89
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rules for FFT #127
Comments
Here is the relevant file in Zygote |
Hey, Should the rules sit here or in AbstractFFTs? @oxinabox What do you think about that? |
Apparently @stevengj suggested they should be moved to AbstractFFTs: JuliaMath/AbstractFFTs.jl#47 (comment) and FluxML/Zygote.jl#835 (comment) |
Thanks a lot for the useful links. |
Note that AbstractFFTs seems to be a much smaller, and much slower-changing, package than ChainRulesCore. Especially if you include a test dep on ChainRulesTestUtilititesEtc, which is also changing. So I'd still vote that they should move here.
|
I think they should just wait for ChainRulesCore 1.0 to be tagged, which is not long away and then they can be in AbstractFFTs. |
Well, technically I can work on that PR because if people decide to move it elsewhere we already would have the code then. |
I made a PR for AbstractFFTs: JuliaMath/AbstractFFTs.jl#58 |
It appears there are adjoint rules for
FFT
in Zygote here:FluxML/Zygote.jl#215
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: