Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DataFrames.jl roadmap #1678

Closed
7 of 31 tasks
bkamins opened this issue Jan 15, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed
7 of 31 tasks

DataFrames.jl roadmap #1678

bkamins opened this issue Jan 15, 2019 · 3 comments
Milestone

Comments

@bkamins
Copy link
Member

bkamins commented Jan 15, 2019

TO-DO for DataFrames.jl 1.0:

TO-DO past DataFrames.jl 1.0 (but may go in before if ready)

CC @nalimilan @oxinabox

@nalimilan nalimilan added this to the 1.0 milestone Jan 25, 2019
@oxinabox
Copy link
Contributor

oxinabox commented May 7, 2019

Update checklist re:

being done

@bkamins
Copy link
Member Author

bkamins commented Sep 2, 2019

@nalimilan - apart from some recent PRs/Issues pending, there are two big outstanding things:

  • crucial split-apply-combine decisions
  • row-oriented API

before we can go 1.0 I think.

Both topics are your pet things, if I may say 😄. Do you have any opinion how we should move forward with it?

@bkamins
Copy link
Member Author

bkamins commented Dec 1, 2019

OK - I am closing this as all things mentioned here are done (except for one small issue that is tracked).

Now we will track 1.0 milestone with milestone labels. You can find the list here https://github.com/JuliaData/DataFrames.jl/milestone/5.

In general we are really close to 0.20 release (probably a few days), and then final design decisions will be made before we fix the functionality for 1.0 release (the decisions are mainly in three areas: split-apply-combine, row-vs-column oriented API, and column transformation API, i.e. :oldcol => f => :newcol pattern).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants