Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: JLL exposing these rootfs images #216

Open
maleadt opened this issue Aug 22, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Feature request: JLL exposing these rootfs images #216

maleadt opened this issue Aug 22, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@maleadt
Copy link
Member

maleadt commented Aug 22, 2022

I want to make PkgEval use the package_linux images that are built here (to eliminate differences between PkgEval and Base CI), and for that it would be convenient if there were a JLL that exposes the latest version of the available images, with automatic platform selection and everything. I'm currently just hard-linking to a specific file from the releases.

I imagine this might also be useful for Sandbox.jl, which similarly hard-links to a single rootfs now: https://github.com/staticfloat/Sandbox.jl/blob/1770a67566e61590b6c8b907430f826ff077b19c/Artifacts.toml#L17-L23

@DilumAluthge
Copy link
Member

@maleadt Is this still something that you would find useful?

@staticfloat How difficult would this be to implement? Would the effort/difficulty of implementing this be worth the benefits?

@maleadt
Copy link
Member Author

maleadt commented Jun 26, 2024

Is this still something that you would find useful?

Yes. We still hard-code artifacts for the rootfs images: https://github.com/JuliaCI/PkgEval.jl/blob/e22f91fc4cab85e21d4781776b375d97a44d7198/Artifacts.toml#L17-L23, and Sandbox.jl does too.
Not particularly important, but it seemed logical to package this up as a JLL like we do for most other platform-dependent artifacts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants