-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 178
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
patientsendpayment #56
Comments
Had a thought about this recently - wouldn't this mode be also useful for tumbler, as it waits between individual coinjoins anway? Also, as tumbler now does round amount coinjoins from time to time, possibility of round amount patientsendpayment matching some taker in reasonable amount of time has increased. |
Note that using fidelity bonds to resist sybil attacks implies that scripts like patientsendpayment won't work. It's been more than 2 years since patientsendpayment stopped being included in joinmarket, and to my knowledge nobody has ever complained that it's missing. We can explain this from the economics; coinjoin fees are so low that very little money is saved by using patientsendpayment, you'd have to really value your time very low to trade several hours for maybe 200 satoshi. |
Not to go against the grain here but I'd appreciate this being readded if at all possible.
It's less about valuing my own time low and more for cases like "I don't care if the coins move now or in a week from now". |
Another vote here for patient send. It could be a way to migrate from wrapped segwit to native segwit for makers. For that matter, "patient send" or custom outputs could be integrated into the yield-generator scripts. I was thinking a custom file with "address, amount" could be specified in a filed like
I was thinking |
... should be added to scripts/
Current script here
To implement an algo of (be a maker for a while until coins run out or) (after delay, switch to taker to send coins) will require starting the Maker protocol, using a monitor loop and when/if times out, shut down as maker and restart Taker protocol. Haven't really looked into this much yet.
This algo is particularly desirable to have, at least in theory (hasn't been used much yet), so as enhancements go, this one should be high priority I think.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: