Skip to content

Model IO #9

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 6, 2023
Merged

Model IO #9

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 6, 2023

Conversation

phadej
Copy link
Collaborator

@phadej phadej commented Sep 15, 2023

No description provided.

@phadej phadej force-pushed the model-io branch 3 times, most recently from 396cb7f to 04290ab Compare September 28, 2023 13:39
Copy link
Collaborator

@dcoutts dcoutts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks very plausible.

@phadej phadej marked this pull request as ready for review October 3, 2023 16:17
with initial type-class for abstracting over real and model io
implementation and a single "smoke" test
Copy link
Collaborator

@dcoutts dcoutts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes this looks great. It's a nice simple wrapper around the pure model, to give a model that implements the imperative mutable API style. And then a class abstracting over (most of) that imperative mutable API to write QC tests against, with an example "classic" QC property, using the class.

One minor suggestion below.

Co-authored-by: Duncan Coutts <duncan@well-typed.com>
@dcoutts dcoutts added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 6, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit b24a324 Oct 6, 2023
@dcoutts dcoutts deleted the model-io branch October 6, 2023 18:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants