Skip to content

Intel LLVM is to use conda's gcc toolchain, sysroot and target libraries #1072

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 15, 2023

Conversation

oleksandr-pavlyk
Copy link
Contributor

Use compiler CFG files for Intel LLVM to use conda's sysroot and toolchain

  • Have you provided a meaningful PR description?
  • Have you added a test, reproducer or referred to an issue with a reproducer?
  • Have you tested your changes locally for CPU and GPU devices?
  • Have you made sure that new changes do not introduce compiler warnings?
  • If this PR is a work in progress, are you filing the PR as a draft?

Copy link
Contributor

@AndresGuzman-Ballen AndresGuzman-Ballen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thought I saw unbalanced "" but it turns out you're just adding those flags to the file ;)

looks good to me!

@github-actions
Copy link

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

coveralls commented Feb 15, 2023

Coverage Status

Coverage: 82.269%. Remained the same when pulling 885b2a3 on conda-build-sh-cfg into b1ee6d1 on master.

@github-actions
Copy link

Array API standard conformance tests for dpctl=0.14.1dev2=py310h41425db_8 ran successfully.
Passed: 33
Failed: 801
Skipped: 280

@oleksandr-pavlyk oleksandr-pavlyk merged commit 8e63098 into master Feb 15, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

Deleted rendered PR docs from intelpython.github.com/dpctl, latest should be updated shortly. 🤞

@oleksandr-pavlyk oleksandr-pavlyk deleted the conda-build-sh-cfg branch February 15, 2023 19:48
@github-actions
Copy link

Array API standard conformance tests for dpctl=0.14.1dev2=py310h41425db_8 ran successfully.
Passed: 33
Failed: 801
Skipped: 280

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants