Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The ability to attach a sm instance at vpc cluster creation is missing #5123

Open
vburckhardt opened this issue Feb 9, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
Labels
enhancement service/Kubernetes Service Issues related to Kubernetes Service Issues

Comments

@vburckhardt
Copy link

Community Note

  • Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
  • Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
  • If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment

Description

ibm_container_ingress_instance allows to attach an instance after creation, but it is not possible to attach an instance at cluster creation through the provider.

The capability exists in the CLI: https://cloud.ibm.com/docs/openshift?topic=openshift-secrets-mgr#secrets-mgr_cluster_create

New or Affected Resource(s)

  • ibm_container_vpc_cluster

Potential Terraform Configuration

# Copy-paste your Terraform configurations here - for large Terraform configs,
# please use a service like Dropbox and share a link to the ZIP file. For
# security, you can also encrypt the files using our GPG public key.

References

  • #0000
@github-actions github-actions bot added the service/Kubernetes Service Issues related to Kubernetes Service Issues label Feb 9, 2024
@hkantare
Copy link
Collaborator

@attilatabori
Can some one from team look into this

@theodoracheng
Copy link
Contributor

@vburckhardt This is the expected behavior - configurations are limited in the cluster configuration resource to limit complexity. The recommended approach is to create the cluster first, then register a default Secrets Manager instance immediately after. Doing so will result in the ingress domain TLS certificates being uploaded to the corresponding Secrets Manager instance.

@vburckhardt
Copy link
Author

Hello @theodoracheng - the terraform provider should surface the same capabilities as the IBM Cloud CLI / API. This is an overall design goal. I do not think the argument around "limiting complexity" makes sense here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement service/Kubernetes Service Issues related to Kubernetes Service Issues
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants