Skip to content

fix: update the node.js to v22 #12

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 20, 2025
Merged

fix: update the node.js to v22 #12

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 20, 2025

Conversation

Hombre2014
Copy link
Owner

@Hombre2014 Hombre2014 commented Jul 20, 2025

Fix: update the node.js to v22.x

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated Node.js version requirement to support versions 20 through 22 for improved compatibility and clarity.

@Hombre2014 Hombre2014 self-assigned this Jul 20, 2025
@Hombre2014 Hombre2014 added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 20, 2025
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 20, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
nextjs-14-auth-v5-tutorial ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jul 20, 2025 8:57am

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 20, 2025

Walkthrough

The package.json file was updated to bump the @types/node development dependency from version ^20 to ^22 and to add an "engines" field specifying that the Node.js runtime version must be between 20 (inclusive) and 23 (exclusive).

Changes

File Change Summary
package.json Updated @types/node devDependency from ^20 to ^22; added "engines": { "node": ">=20 <23" } field specifying supported Node.js versions.

Poem

A bunny hopped to package.json’s glen,
And left a note for devs and friends:
"Node twenty to twenty-three,
Is the range for you and me!"
Types updated, engines set right,
Our code now leaps with pure delight! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ee324b2 and 28e31c4.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • package.json

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ab0d352 and ee324b2.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (1 hunks)

package.json Outdated
Comment on lines 56 to 59
},
"engines": {
"node": "22.x"
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Node 22.x constraint is premature & breaks type-/runtime alignment

  1. Node 22 is still in Current (not LTS) status; many cloud builders (Vercel, Netlify, most CI images) default to ≤20. Requiring 22 will hard-fail installs in those environments.
  2. @types/node is pinned to ^20 (line 45) which does not cover the 22 std-lib surface; type mismatches will appear.
  3. No CI / Docker / .nvmrc update is included, so contributors will silently run an older Node and npm will refuse to install due to the new engines field.

Consider loosening the range until 22 becomes LTS and all tooling is updated:

-  "engines": {
-    "node": "22.x"
-  }
+  "engines": {
+    "node": ">=20 <23"
+  }

…and bump @types/node accordingly when you really adopt 22.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check @types/node version in package.json
grep -R '"@types/node"' -n package.json

# Check engines field in package.json
grep -R '"engines"' -n package.json -A3

# Check for .nvmrc file
fd --hidden --max-depth 3 .nvmrc

# List CI workflow files
find .github/workflows -type f -name "*.yml" -maxdepth 1

Length of output: 316


Loosen Node.js engine range to avoid install failures

The current "node": "22.x" constraint will hard-fail installs in most CI and hosting environments that default to Node 20 or below, and it’s out of sync with your @types/node dependency. Please update as follows:

• package.json (line 45): @types/node is pinned to ^20
• package.json (lines 57–59): "engines": { "node": "22.x" }
• No .nvmrc or CI config was found to enforce Node 22

Suggested change:

-  "engines": {
-    "node": "22.x"
-  }
+  "engines": {
+    "node": ">=20 <23"
+  }

…and when you’re ready to adopt Node 22, bump @types/node to ^22 and add/update your .nvmrc or CI workflows accordingly.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
},
"engines": {
"node": "22.x"
}
},
"engines": {
"node": ">=20 <23"
}
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In package.json around lines 56 to 59, the Node.js engine version is strictly
set to "22.x", which can cause install failures in environments using Node 20 or
below and is inconsistent with the @types/node dependency pinned to ^20. Loosen
the Node.js engine version constraint to allow compatibility with Node 20 by
changing the "node" field under "engines" to a range that includes Node 20, such
as ">=20.x <23". This will prevent install failures and align with the current
@types/node version. Later, when ready to fully adopt Node 22, update
@types/node to ^22 and add or update .nvmrc or CI configurations accordingly.

@Hombre2014 Hombre2014 merged commit 288f588 into main Jul 20, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant