You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the scope-defining field requires specifying the project ID on either the resource or namespace level.
Proposed Improvement
As a cluster operator, it would be beneficial to specify the project scope directly on the ConfigConnector resource. This approach would eliminate the need to duplicate the project ID across multiple namespaces or resources.
Potential Implementation
A possible modification to the ConfigConnector spec could look like this:
apiVersion: core.cnrm.cloud.google.com/v1beta1kind: ConfigConnectormetadata:
name: configconnector.core.cnrm.cloud.google.comspec:
projectId: xxxx # New field...
Extended Application
This concept of centralized scope definition could also be applied to other scopes, such as folder or organization levels.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Checklist
Describe the feature or resource
Be able to define the project scope on the ConfigConnector custom resource.
It is similar to annotation on resource or namespace, but allow to define on the ConfigConnector level.
Additional information
https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/k8s-config-connector/blob/v1.121.0/operator/config/crd/bases/core.cnrm.cloud.google.com_configconnectors.yaml
Importance
Current Situation
Currently, the scope-defining field requires specifying the project ID on either the resource or namespace level.
Proposed Improvement
As a cluster operator, it would be beneficial to specify the project scope directly on the ConfigConnector resource. This approach would eliminate the need to duplicate the project ID across multiple namespaces or resources.
Potential Implementation
A possible modification to the ConfigConnector spec could look like this:
Extended Application
This concept of centralized scope definition could also be applied to other scopes, such as folder or organization levels.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: