Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Launch-plan for sw-framework & sw-cli #111

Closed
7 tasks
addyosmani opened this issue Jan 9, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed
7 tasks

Launch-plan for sw-framework & sw-cli #111

addyosmani opened this issue Jan 9, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@addyosmani
Copy link
Member

addyosmani commented Jan 9, 2017

Library Affected:
All new libraries

Browser & Platform:
All browsers

Issue or Feature Request Description:

While we can't publicly comment on I/O dates just yet, I think these are good top-level goals:

  • Launch a stable version of sw-framework and the CLI
  • Publish stable API documentation for both these pieces in the repo
  • Publish developer guides (getting started, migrating from sw-toolbox/precache) on /web
  • Prepare working demo app (could be iFixit or one of the HackerNews apps) using sw-framework

Nice-to-haves:

  • Launch a stable version of the Background Sync library with docs + example
  • Migrate sw-offline-google-analytics to the new Background Sync library

Stretch:

  • Update existing toolbox/precache codelab to use sw-framework

This is dependent on #110, #109, #134, #169, #198, #202, #206, #205, #173, #164, #135, #195 landing.

@prateekbh
Copy link
Collaborator

prateekbh commented Jan 9, 2017

Will it be cool if we can launch a 0.1 version of BGSync library without binary request?
that ways only docs and Request Wrapper remains for me to complete.

@addyosmani
Copy link
Member Author

Will it be cool if we can launch a 0.1 version of BGSync library without binary request?
that ways only docs and Request Wrapper remains for me to complete.

👍 Let's do that too.

@prateekbh
Copy link
Collaborator

FYI: I've done docs, demo and RequestWrapper too.
Some reformatting might be needed though.

@addyosmani
Copy link
Member Author

@gauntface @jeffposnick For the Sydney beta, shall I go ahead and move the issues we want to nail down before that release into a milestone we can track? We can do a separate one for I/O once we hear more team feedback in our hackday.

@gauntface
Copy link

@addyosmani please do

@addyosmani addyosmani modified the milestone: Service Worker Framework (beta) Feb 17, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants