Added simple fix for mergemessageformats override #2376
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
asbjornu
approved these changes
Aug 4, 2020
Member
|
Thank you for your contributions, @chrisism. 🙏 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #2371. When you set your own custom merge-message-formats it will get overwritten when applying gitversion.
Running the gitversion /showConfig will just show a emtpy dictionary again :
commit-date-format: yyyy-MM-dd merge-message-formats: {} update-build-number: true
Description
Quick fix in ConfigurationBuilder by instead of checking only for the MergeMessageFormats to be null, actually checking if it has any values.
Proper resolution still needed, because this will not actually merge the two dictionaries.
Related Issue
Issue #2371
Motivation and Context
See the issue for more details. This will now solve the situation that custom formats are not applied.
How Has This Been Tested?
Ran all the unittests, using it in own build server environment.
Checklist: