Description
This issue is opened to further discuss the #106 (comment) about gmt.info
.
Do you think we should print the output instead of returning it? There could be a flag to trigger a return instead of printing.
IMHO, returning the output makes more sense than printing it. It's easy for users to print it via print(gmt.info())
if they need.
Either way, if the returned string is just a list of numbers, it would be better to return an array/list of the number instead.
As far as I know, the outputs of gmt info
can be divided into following types when different options are used:
Type 1
$ gmt info points.txt
points.txt: N = 20 <11.5309/61.7074> <-2.9289/7.8648> <0.1412/0.9338>
I think this type is useless in most cases. We can leave it as it is.
Type 2
$ gmt info points.txt -C
11.5309 61.7074 -2.9289 7.8648 0.1412 0.9338
We can convert this type to a list/array.
Type 3
$ gmt info points.txt -I0.1
-R11.5/61.8/-3/7.9
-Rw/e/s/n
is useless for Python. Should be convert to a list/array.
Type 4
$ gmt info points.txt -T0.1
-T11.5/61.8/0.1
Useless. Should be convert to a list/array.
Types 5
$ gmt info points.txt -Ib
11.5309 -2.9289
61.7074 -2.9289
61.7074 7.8648
11.5309 7.8648
11.5309 -2.9289
gmt info -Ib
reports the bounding box polygon for the data files, which is usually used in further fig.plot()
. So it may make more sense to return it as two arrays x
and y
. A much general way is to return it as a ndarray, so users can access the first column via output[:,0]
and the ith column via output[:,i-1]
.
If -Af|s
option is used, the output becomes more complicated, e.g.:
$ gmt info points.txt points-copy.txt -C -Af
11.5309 61.7074 -2.9289 7.8648 0.1412 0.9338
11.5309 61.7074 -2.9289 7.8648 0.1412 0.9338
In such cases, we can return the output as a ndarray.
Conclusion
What we can do with the gmt.info
outputs:
- convert it to an array (type 2-4)
- convert it to a multi-dimensional ndarray (type 2-5 and some more complicated cases).
- leave the output as it is (type 1 and other cases not discussed in the issue).