-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cannot start on Ubuntu 20.04 #11
Comments
This might be related to wails, and not to Hatt itself. I'll have a closer look |
Could you try installing |
Already have it installed sadly $ sudo apt install libc6
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
libc6 is already the newest version (2.31-0ubuntu9.9).
0 to upgrade, 0 to newly install, 0 to remove and 0 not to upgrade. Note |
It does indeed look like a Wails issue however. As such im not sure this is up to Hatt to solve, unless statically compiling it is a possibility. Feel free to close if not. Also worth noting these related golang issues: |
Thanks for the references. I'll have a look at static compilation |
Possibly another helpful link, I see that |
|
Maybe a better, less "dirty" solution to this problem is to think about using an alternative method of distributing the app, such as a flatpak (my personal favourite), AppImage or snap pacakge. I have been interested learning to build flatpak images, so might be able to find some time to look into this myself if you don't have time. I cant promise when this will be though! |
Yea, AppImage or faltpak seem more interesting (as it is clearer that the binary comes with external libs that could be already installed). Please don't hesitate to let me know if you look into this ! |
When attempting to launch on my PC i get the following error
./Hatt: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.32' not found (required by ./Hatt)
I have
glibc
already installed, but it seems to be the wrong version (maybe because it was compiled on another version of Ubuntu or different distribution all together)Im wondering if it might be better to statically compile the binary?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: