ospf6d: Type-7 LSA originated with wrong sequence number #9193

mobash-rasool · 2021-07-27T08:11:09Z

RCA: When Type-7 LSA is updated, the LSDB is searched, if the
LSA is present in the LSDB then the LSA is updated with next
sequence number and if not then it is originated with the
INITIAL sequence number.
Here while originating Type-7 LSA Process Level LSDB is searched
for instead of area level LSDB.

Fix: Search in the area level LSDB and not in the process level.

Fixes #9099

Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool mrasool@vmware.com

idryzhov · 2021-07-27T08:21:32Z

For the future – please, use "Fixes #X" or "Closes #X" instead of "Issue #X" to automatically close the issue when the PR is merged.

mobash-rasool · 2021-07-27T08:25:00Z

For the future – please, use "Fixes #X" or "Closes #X" instead of "Issue #X" to automatically close the issue when the PR is merged.

Sure. Thanks for letting me know.

LabN-CI · 2021-07-27T08:46:26Z

Outdated results 💚

Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failed

_	_
Result	SUCCESS git merge/9193 `0bbe62d`
Date	07/27/2021
Start	04:20:55
Finish	04:46:21
Run-Time	25:26
Total	1813
Pass	1813
Fail	0
Valgrind-Errors
Valgrind-Loss
Details	vncregress-2021-07-27-04:20:55.txt
Log	autoscript-2021-07-27-04:22:08.log.bz2
Memory	492 514 426

For details, please contact louberger

donaldsharp · 2021-07-27T12:11:49Z

How about we just force push the commit change that addresses this issue

NetDEF-CI · 2021-07-27T12:35:47Z

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Congratulations, this patch passed basic tests

Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System

CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-20561/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

Warnings Generated during build:

Checkout code: Successful with additional warnings

Report for ospf6_nssa.c | 2 issues
===============================================
< WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
< #1264: FILE: /tmp/f1-25418/ospf6_nssa.c:1264:

RCA: When Type-7 LSA is updated, the LSDB is searched, if the LSA is present in the LSDB then the LSA is updated with next sequence number and if not then it is originated with the INITIAL sequence number. Here while originating Type-7 LSA Process Level LSDB is searched for instead of area level LSDB. Fix: Search in the area level LSDB and not in the process level. Fixes FRRouting#9099 Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>

LabN-CI · 2021-07-27T13:32:20Z

💚 Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failed

Results table

_	_
Result	SUCCESS git merge/9193 `96cad17`
Date	07/27/2021
Start	09:06:36
Finish	09:32:15
Run-Time	25:39
Total	1813
Pass	1813
Fail	0
Valgrind-Errors
Valgrind-Loss
Details	vncregress-2021-07-27-09:06:36.txt
Log	autoscript-2021-07-27-09:07:51.log.bz2
Memory	517 500 430

For details, please contact louberger

riw777

looks good

NetDEF-CI · 2021-07-27T17:48:04Z

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

See below for issues.
CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-20570/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

Get source / Pull Request: Successful

Building Stage: Successful

Basic Tests: Failed

Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 9: Failed (click for details)

Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPO9U18AMD64-20570/test

Topology Tests failed for Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 9:

2021-07-27 14:36:22,399 WARNING: vtysh_cmd: r0: failed to convert json output: : No JSON object could be decoded
2021-07-27 14:36:44,774 WARNING: vtysh_cmd: r1: failed to convert json output: : No JSON object could be decoded
2021-07-27 14:51:23,024 ERROR: Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/root/bamboo-agent-home/xml-data/build-dir/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPO9U18AMD64/topotests/lib/common_config.py", line 1866, in create_interfaces_cfg
    tgen, c_router, interface_data, "interface_config", build=build
  File "/root/bamboo-agent-home/xml-data/build-dir/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPO9U18AMD64/topotests/lib/common_config.py", line 363, in create_common_configuration
    load_config_to_router(tgen, router)
  File "/root/bamboo-agent-home/xml-data/build-dir/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPO9U18AMD64/topotests/lib/common_config.py", line 590, in load_config_to_router
    raise InvalidCLIError("%s" % output)
InvalidCLIError: line 3: % Unknown command[16]: ip ospf hello-interval 65536 


2021-07-27 14:52:10,760 ERROR: Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/root/bamboo-agent-home/xml-data/build-dir/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPO9U18AMD64/topotests/lib/common_config.py", line 1866, in create_interfaces_cfg
    tgen, c_router, interface_data, "interface_config", build=build
  File "/root/bamboo-agent-home/xml-data/build-dir/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPO9U18AMD64/topotests/lib/common_config.py", line 363, in create_common_configuration
    load_config_to_router(tgen, router)
  File "/root/bamboo-agent-home/xml-data/build-dir/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPO9U18AMD64/topotests/lib/common_config.py", line 590, in load_config_to_router
    raise InvalidCLIError("%s" % output)
InvalidCLIError: line 3: % Unknown command[16]: ip ospf dead-interval 65536 


2021-07-27 15:11:07,756 ERROR: r1: zebra left a dead pidfile (pid=26945)

see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-20570/artifact/TOPO9U18AMD64/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt

Successful on other platforms/tests

Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 2
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 7
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 6
Ubuntu 16.04 deb pkg check
Addresssanitizer topotests part 6
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 2
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 6
Ubuntu 20.04 deb pkg check
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 1
Addresssanitizer topotests part 2
Ubuntu 18.04 deb pkg check
Debian 9 deb pkg check
CentOS 7 rpm pkg check
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 2
Debian 10 deb pkg check
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 8
Addresssanitizer topotests part 9
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 3
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 8
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 0
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 3
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 1
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 1
Addresssanitizer topotests part 7
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 8
Addresssanitizer topotests part 3
Addresssanitizer topotests part 5
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 4
Static analyzer (clang)
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 9
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 7
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 0
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 0
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 5
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 4
IPv4 ldp protocol on Ubuntu 18.04
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 0
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 9
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 5
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 9
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 4
Addresssanitizer topotests part 0
IPv6 protocols on Ubuntu 18.04
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 3
Fedora 29 rpm pkg check
Addresssanitizer topotests part 1
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 5
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 3
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 8
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 5
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 7
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 6
Addresssanitizer topotests part 4
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 4
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 7
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 6
IPv4 protocols on Ubuntu 18.04
Addresssanitizer topotests part 8
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 1
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 2

riw777 · 2021-07-27T18:48:48Z

ci:rerun

NetDEF-CI · 2021-07-28T00:25:04Z

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

See below for issues.
CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-20584/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

Get source / Pull Request: Successful

Building Stage: Successful

Basic Tests: Failed

Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 1: Failed (click for details)

Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TP1U1804AMD64-20584/test

Topology Tests failed for Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 1:

2021-07-27 20:41:09,219 ERROR: r3: isisd left a dead pidfile (pid=12677)
2021-07-27 20:44:27,006 ERROR: 'router_json_cmp' failed after 134.37 seconds
2021-07-27 20:44:27,011 ERROR: assert failed at "bfd_topo2.test_bfd_topo2/test_protocols_convergence": "r4" JSON output mismatches
assert Generated JSON diff error report:
  
  > $: d2 has key '2001:db8:1::/64' which is not present in d1
2021-07-27 21:14:45,349 ERROR: Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/root/bamboo-agent-home/xml-data/build-dir/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TP1U1804AMD64/topotests/lib/bgp.py", line 204, in create_router_bgp
    tgen, router, data_all_bgp, "bgp", build, load_config
  File "/root/bamboo-agent-home/xml-data/build-dir/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TP1U1804AMD64/topotests/lib/common_config.py", line 363, in create_common_configuration
    load_config_to_router(tgen, router)
  File "/root/bamboo-agent-home/xml-data/build-dir/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TP1U1804AMD64/topotests/lib/common_config.py", line 590, in load_config_to_router
    raise InvalidCLIError("%s" % output)
InvalidCLIError: line 6: % Unknown command[27]: neighbor 10.0.0.13 remote-as 0 
% Specify remote-as or peer-group commands first
line 7: Failure to communicate[13] to bgpd, line: neighbor 10.0.0.13 timers 3 10 

line 9: % Unknown command[30]: neighbor fd00:0:0:3::1 remote-as 0 
% Specify remote-as or peer-group commands first
line 11: Failure to communicate[13] to bgpd, line: neighbor fd00:0:0:3::1 activate 

% Specify remote-as or peer-group commands first
line 12: Failure to communicate[13] to bgpd, line: neighbor fd00:0:0:3::1 timers 3 10 

% Specify remote-as or peer-group commands first
line 14: Failure to communicate[13] to bgpd, line: no neighbor fd00:0:0:3::1 activate 



2021-07-27 21:14:45,893 ERROR: Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/root/bamboo-agent-home/xml-data/build-dir/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TP1U1804AMD64/topotests/lib/bgp.py", line 204, in create_router_bgp
    tgen, router, data_all_bgp, "bgp", build, load_config
  File "/root/bamboo-agent-home/xml-data/build-dir/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TP1U1804AMD64/topotests/lib/common_config.py", line 363, in create_common_configuration
    load_config_to_router(tgen, router)
  File "/root/bamboo-agent-home/xml-data/build-dir/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TP1U1804AMD64/topotests/lib/common_config.py", line 590, in load_config_to_router
    raise InvalidCLIError("%s" % output)
InvalidCLIError: % No BGP process is configured
line 2: Failure to communicate[13] to bgpd, line: no router bgp

see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-20584/artifact/TP1U1804AMD64/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt

Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 8: Failed (click for details)

Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 8: No useful log found

Successful on other platforms/tests

Ubuntu 18.04 deb pkg check
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 1
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 7
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 6
Ubuntu 20.04 deb pkg check
Addresssanitizer topotests part 4
Debian 9 deb pkg check
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 2
CentOS 7 rpm pkg check
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 8
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 2
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 2
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 7
Addresssanitizer topotests part 9
Addresssanitizer topotests part 2
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 3
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 3
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 5
Addresssanitizer topotests part 7
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 0
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 8
Static analyzer (clang)
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 3
Addresssanitizer topotests part 5
Ubuntu 16.04 deb pkg check
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 2
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 6
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 1
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 0
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 6
Addresssanitizer topotests part 0
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 5
IPv4 ldp protocol on Ubuntu 18.04
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 4
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 0
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 9
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 4
Addresssanitizer topotests part 3
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 5
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 4
IPv6 protocols on Ubuntu 18.04
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 0
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 9
Addresssanitizer topotests part 1
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 3
IPv4 protocols on Ubuntu 18.04
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 6
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 1
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 4
Addresssanitizer topotests part 8
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 9
Debian 10 deb pkg check
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 8
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 7
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 7
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 9
Fedora 29 rpm pkg check
Addresssanitizer topotests part 6
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 5

mobash-rasool · 2021-07-28T10:35:32Z

ci:rerun

NetDEF-CI · 2021-07-28T14:42:15Z

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

See below for issues.
CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-20594/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

Get source / Pull Request: Successful

Building Stage: Successful

Basic Tests: Failed

Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 1: Failed (click for details)

Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPO1U18I386-20594/test

Topology Tests failed for Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 1:

2021-07-28 13:19:38,090 ERROR: 'router_json_cmp' failed after 135.84 seconds
2021-07-28 13:19:38,092 ERROR: assert failed at "bfd_topo2.test_bfd_topo2/test_protocols_convergence": "r4" JSON output mismatches
assert Generated JSON diff error report:
  
  > $: d2 has key '2001:db8:1::/64' which is not present in d1
2021-07-28 13:49:36,483 ERROR: Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/root/bamboo-agent-home/xml-data/build-dir/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPO1U18I386/topotests/lib/bgp.py", line 204, in create_router_bgp
    tgen, router, data_all_bgp, "bgp", build, load_config
  File "/root/bamboo-agent-home/xml-data/build-dir/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPO1U18I386/topotests/lib/common_config.py", line 363, in create_common_configuration
    load_config_to_router(tgen, router)
  File "/root/bamboo-agent-home/xml-data/build-dir/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPO1U18I386/topotests/lib/common_config.py", line 590, in load_config_to_router
    raise InvalidCLIError("%s" % output)
InvalidCLIError: line 6: % Unknown command[27]: neighbor 10.0.0.13 remote-as 0 
% Specify remote-as or peer-group commands first
line 7: Failure to communicate[13] to bgpd, line: neighbor 10.0.0.13 timers 3 10 

line 9: % Unknown command[30]: neighbor fd00:0:0:3::1 remote-as 0 
% Specify remote-as or peer-group commands first
line 11: Failure to communicate[13] to bgpd, line: neighbor fd00:0:0:3::1 activate 

% Specify remote-as or peer-group commands first
line 12: Failure to communicate[13] to bgpd, line: neighbor fd00:0:0:3::1 timers 3 10 

% Specify remote-as or peer-group commands first
line 14: Failure to communicate[13] to bgpd, line: no neighbor fd00:0:0:3::1 activate 



2021-07-28 13:49:37,145 ERROR: Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/root/bamboo-agent-home/xml-data/build-dir/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPO1U18I386/topotests/lib/bgp.py", line 204, in create_router_bgp
    tgen, router, data_all_bgp, "bgp", build, load_config
  File "/root/bamboo-agent-home/xml-data/build-dir/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPO1U18I386/topotests/lib/common_config.py", line 363, in create_common_configuration
    load_config_to_router(tgen, router)
  File "/root/bamboo-agent-home/xml-data/build-dir/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPO1U18I386/topotests/lib/common_config.py", line 590, in load_config_to_router
    raise InvalidCLIError("%s" % output)
InvalidCLIError: % No BGP process is configured
line 2: Failure to communicate[13] to bgpd, line: no router bgp

see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-20594/artifact/TOPO1U18I386/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt

Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 6: Failed (click for details)

Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TOPO6U18AMD64-20594/test

Topology Tests failed for Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 6:

2021-07-28 11:22:36,625 ERROR: ce1: bgpd left a dead pidfile (pid=8726)
2021-07-28 11:23:11,794 ERROR: r2: bgpd left a dead pidfile (pid=11862)
2021-07-28 11:35:16,390 ERROR: 'router_json_cmp' failed after 130.83 seconds
2021-07-28 11:35:16,397 ERROR: assert failed at "bgp_vrf_lite_ipv6_rtadv.test_bgp_vrf_lite_ipv6_rtadv/test_protocols_convergence": "r1" JSON output mismatches
assert Generated JSON diff error report:
  
  > $->2001:db8:1::/64: d1 has Array of length 1 but in d2 it is of length 2
*** defaultIntf: warning: r1 has no interfaces
2021-07-28 11:36:19,334 ERROR: host1: pimd left a dead pidfile (pid=19124)

see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-20594/artifact/TOPO6U18AMD64/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt

Successful on other platforms/tests

Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 3
CentOS 7 rpm pkg check
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 8
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 1
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 7
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 9
Addresssanitizer topotests part 2
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 8
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 0
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 3
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 5
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 2
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 6
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 2
Addresssanitizer topotests part 9
Addresssanitizer topotests part 4
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 7
Ubuntu 16.04 deb pkg check
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 2
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 6
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 2
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 4
Addresssanitizer topotests part 7
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 9
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 8
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 0
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 4
Addresssanitizer topotests part 0
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 5
Addresssanitizer topotests part 5
Static analyzer (clang)
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 1
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 3
Ubuntu 18.04 deb pkg check
Addresssanitizer topotests part 3
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 5
Addresssanitizer topotests part 1
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 5
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 8
IPv4 ldp protocol on Ubuntu 18.04
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 6
IPv4 protocols on Ubuntu 18.04
Addresssanitizer topotests part 8
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 1
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 3
IPv6 protocols on Ubuntu 18.04
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 0
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 4
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 7
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 9
Addresssanitizer topotests part 6
Debian 10 deb pkg check
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 7
Debian 9 deb pkg check
Topotests debian 10 amd64 part 9
Fedora 29 rpm pkg check
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 4
Ubuntu 20.04 deb pkg check
Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 i386 part 0

donaldsharp · 2021-07-28T14:45:12Z

ci:rerun

NetDEF-CI · 2021-07-28T19:39:39Z

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Congratulations, this patch passed basic tests

Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System

CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-20599/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

idryzhov · 2021-07-29T20:29:30Z

@Mergifyio backport stable/8.0

mergify · 2021-07-29T20:47:10Z

Command backport stable/8.0: success

Backports have been created

#9234 ospf6d: Type-7 LSA originated with wrong sequence number (backport #9193) has been created for branch stable/8.0

polychaeta added the ospfv3 label Jul 27, 2021

mobash-rasool force-pushed the ospfv3-bug-fixes branch from 0bbe62d to 96cad17 Compare July 27, 2021 12:40

riw777 self-requested a review July 27, 2021 15:57

qlyoung self-requested a review July 27, 2021 15:58

riw777 approved these changes Jul 27, 2021

View reviewed changes

riw777 merged commit 3ad921a into FRRouting:master Jul 29, 2021

mergify bot mentioned this pull request Jul 29, 2021

ospf6d: Type-7 LSA originated with wrong sequence number (backport #9193) #9234

Closed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

ospf6d: Type-7 LSA originated with wrong sequence number #9193

ospf6d: Type-7 LSA originated with wrong sequence number #9193

mobash-rasool commented Jul 27, 2021 •

edited

Loading

idryzhov commented Jul 27, 2021

mobash-rasool commented Jul 27, 2021

LabN-CI commented Jul 27, 2021 •

edited

Loading

Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failed

donaldsharp commented Jul 27, 2021

NetDEF-CI commented Jul 27, 2021 •

edited

Loading

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Warnings Generated during build:

LabN-CI commented Jul 27, 2021

riw777 left a comment

NetDEF-CI commented Jul 27, 2021 •

edited

Loading

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

Get source / Pull Request: Successful

Building Stage: Successful

Basic Tests: Failed

riw777 commented Jul 27, 2021

NetDEF-CI commented Jul 28, 2021 •

edited

Loading

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

Get source / Pull Request: Successful

Building Stage: Successful

Basic Tests: Failed

mobash-rasool commented Jul 28, 2021

NetDEF-CI commented Jul 28, 2021 •

edited

Loading

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

Get source / Pull Request: Successful

Building Stage: Successful

Basic Tests: Failed

donaldsharp commented Jul 28, 2021

NetDEF-CI commented Jul 28, 2021

idryzhov commented Jul 29, 2021

mergify bot commented Jul 29, 2021

ospf6d: Type-7 LSA originated with wrong sequence number #9193

ospf6d: Type-7 LSA originated with wrong sequence number #9193

Conversation

mobash-rasool commented Jul 27, 2021 • edited Loading

idryzhov commented Jul 27, 2021

mobash-rasool commented Jul 27, 2021

LabN-CI commented Jul 27, 2021 • edited Loading

Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failed

donaldsharp commented Jul 27, 2021

NetDEF-CI commented Jul 27, 2021 • edited Loading

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Warnings Generated during build:

LabN-CI commented Jul 27, 2021

💚 Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failed

riw777 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

NetDEF-CI commented Jul 27, 2021 • edited Loading

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

Get source / Pull Request: Successful

Building Stage: Successful

Basic Tests: Failed

riw777 commented Jul 27, 2021

NetDEF-CI commented Jul 28, 2021 • edited Loading

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

Get source / Pull Request: Successful

Building Stage: Successful

Basic Tests: Failed

mobash-rasool commented Jul 28, 2021

NetDEF-CI commented Jul 28, 2021 • edited Loading

Continuous Integration Result: FAILED

Get source / Pull Request: Successful

Building Stage: Successful

Basic Tests: Failed

donaldsharp commented Jul 28, 2021

NetDEF-CI commented Jul 28, 2021

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

idryzhov commented Jul 29, 2021

mergify bot commented Jul 29, 2021

mobash-rasool commented Jul 27, 2021 •

edited

Loading

LabN-CI commented Jul 27, 2021 •

edited

Loading

NetDEF-CI commented Jul 27, 2021 •

edited

Loading

NetDEF-CI commented Jul 27, 2021 •

edited

Loading

NetDEF-CI commented Jul 28, 2021 •

edited

Loading

NetDEF-CI commented Jul 28, 2021 •

edited

Loading