Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Invoices setting screen #50565

Merged

Conversation

rezkiy37
Copy link
Contributor

@rezkiy37 rezkiy37 commented Oct 10, 2024

Details

The PR replaces the legacy sections of the invoices page with the new ones.
Note: this PR should be merged right after #50571 because it integrates API there.

Fixed Issues

$ #45175
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

Preconditions:

  • Enable invoices of a workspace
  1. Open the workspace’s invoices page
  2. Verify that there are 2 sections: balance, bank accounts and details.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as "Tests".

QA Steps

Same as "Tests".

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native Android
Android: mWeb Chrome Android Chrome
iOS: Native IOS
iOS: mWeb Safari IOS Simulator
MacOS: Chrome / Safari Chrome
MacOS: Desktop Desktop

@rezkiy37 rezkiy37 mentioned this pull request Oct 17, 2024
50 tasks
@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

We're still missing the stylized page header:
CleanShot 2024-10-17 at 17 19 11@2x

@rezkiy37 rezkiy37 changed the title [WIP] Update Invoices setting screen Update Invoices setting screen Oct 17, 2024
@rezkiy37 rezkiy37 marked this pull request as ready for review October 17, 2024 16:34
@rezkiy37 rezkiy37 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 17, 2024 16:34
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from fedirjh and removed request for a team October 17, 2024 16:34
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 17, 2024

@fedirjh Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@rezkiy37
Copy link
Contributor Author

Note: this PR should be merged right after #50571 because it integrates API there.

@rezkiy37
Copy link
Contributor Author

We're still missing the stylized page header: CleanShot 2024-10-17 at 17 19 11@2x

I've added the icon and aligned the header. Fixed - 52d02d8.

Details Screenshot 2024-10-17 at 18 39 34

cc @shawnborton

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

I deleted my last comment, you have the right icon in place - sorry about that!

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

That looks good to me, cc @JmillsExpensify to make sure you have visibility into this one as well.

@rezkiy37
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've updated the sections descriptions agreed in Slack.

Details

Screenshot 2024-10-22 at 12 53 53

cc @shawnborton

@rezkiy37
Copy link
Contributor Author

Aligned text styles - 71b7feb.

Details

Screenshot 2024-10-22 at 13 13 21

cc @shawnborton

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Hmm I'm not seeing any changes? This part of the invoice view:
CleanShot 2024-10-22 at 13 22 16@2x

Should look more like the Settings > Wallet view:
CleanShot 2024-10-22 at 13 22 40@2x

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Though we chatted on Slack that we want all of the paragraph text below the card's title to use our text supporting color, just like the rest of the workspace editor has:

CleanShot 2024-10-22 at 13 23 24@2x

So that means we need to update Settings to match (or not, we can do that as a follow up).

@rezkiy37
Copy link
Contributor Author

rezkiy37 commented Oct 22, 2024

Hmm I'm not seeing any changes? This part of the invoice view: CleanShot 2024-10-22 at 13 22 16@2x

Should look more like the Settings > Wallet view: CleanShot 2024-10-22 at 13 22 40@2x

Do you think it looks correct? @shawnborton

Screenshot 2024-10-22 at 13 31 06

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Nice, that looks good to me!

@rezkiy37
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fedirjh bump

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Oct 23, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native Screenshot 2024-10-23 at 3 17 42 PM Screenshot 2024-10-23 at 3 18 40 PM
Android: mWeb Chrome Screenshot 2024-10-23 at 3 20 01 PM Screenshot 2024-10-23 at 3 20 06 PM
iOS: Native

Screenshot 2024-10-23 at 2 55 07 PM

Screenshot 2024-10-23 at 2 55 52 PM

iOS: mWeb Safari

Screenshot 2024-10-23 at 2 51 14 PM

Screenshot 2024-10-23 at 2 51 17 PM

Screenshot 2024-10-23 at 2 52 52 PM

MacOS: Chrome / Safari Screenshot 2024-10-23 at 2 21 33 PM
MacOS: Desktop Screenshot 2024-10-23 at 3 06 41 PM Screenshot 2024-10-23 at 3 06 58 PM

Copy link
Contributor

@fedirjh fedirjh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. cc @Expensify/design

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Looks pretty good to me! I'm going to run a test build so I can take it for a spin in my account but the screenshots seem correct at first glance.

@dannymcclain
Copy link
Contributor

Looking much better

Copy link
Contributor

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Styles look good to me. Is it known that the Company name and Company website fields don't work/don't save though? Not sure if that was a regression introduced here or not.

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Oct 23, 2024

Is it known that the Company name and Company website fields don't work/don't save though?

Yes, It will be handled in:

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Sounds good, thanks for confirming. I think this is all good from a design standpoint then, thanks for the changes here!

@madmax330 madmax330 merged commit 8e13bcc into Expensify:main Oct 24, 2024
17 checks passed
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Emergency label Oct 24, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 24, 2024

@madmax330 looks like this was merged without a test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@madmax330
Copy link
Contributor

Tests were passing

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/madmax330 in version: 9.0.54-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Beamanator in version: 9.0.54-11 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄 skipped 🚫
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄 skipped 🚫

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Beamanator in version: 9.0.54-11 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄 skipped 🚫
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄 skipped 🚫

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants